Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / General / Hardware / August 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Multiple Concurrent Hard Drive Failures -- Who Bears Responsibility?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
TaliesinSoft - 18 Aug 2007 09:01 GMT
A couple days ago I installed a brand new LaCie 500 GB external drive, adding
it to my firewire 800 chain which already hosted two LaCie drives, one 500 GB
and one 160 GB. I'm running on a MacBook Pro and using OS X 10.4.10. The new
drive was intended to be a recipient of SuperDuper! backups

After connecting the new drive I used Disk Utility to partition it into three
equal sized volumes. I then proceeded to run SuperDuper! to create a backup
on one of the partitions. A few minutes into the backup SuperDuper! produced
an error message stateing that there had been a failure on the recipient
drive.

A quick check of things revealed that both the new 500 GB drive and the 160
GB drive on the firewire chain had undergone failure and would no longer even
turn on. In addition the internal drive in the MacBook failed.

Fortunately I had yet another set of external drives that hadn't failed, one
containing backups. At this time I am booting off of one of those drives and
using the other as a recipient of backups.

The failure has been reported to LaCie but as of now I haven't received any
information back in regards to replacing the faulty drive, the one that
appears to have been the initiator of the failures. I have received
suggestions from LaCie regarding methods to verify that the failures were
indeed such, and when followed these suggestions have essentially confirmed
that the drives were in a state of failure.

I have been told that it is in the nature of the beast that an electrical
failure on a device attached by firewire can propagate to other devices also
attached via firewire.

My question is whether I should expect LaCie to absorb the cost of replacing
the two dead external drives, and the dead internal drive? The other damaged
external drive was also a LaCie.

As a somewhat ironic aside, it was just within the last few weeks that I
posted here in these discussions that I had experienced extremely reliable
performance from my LaCie drives.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

VAXman-  @SendSpamHere.ORG - 18 Aug 2007 15:17 GMT
>A couple days ago I installed a brand new LaCie 500 GB external drive, adding
>it to my firewire 800 chain which already hosted two LaCie drives, one 500 GB
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>posted here in these discussions that I had experienced extremely reliable
>performance from my LaCie drives.

Aye, to my query about their reliability.

FWIW, my wife and I purchased purchased the Data Rescue product we tried
in demo mode (which seemed to find all the files).  We ran the Data Rescue
on the 1TB LaCie.  My only gripe is that the files are returned with only
crypitic names with extensions that identify the type of file (.JPG, .PDF,
.CR2, .M4A, etc.).  The recovery disk did show all the files as they were
named but when I looked at them from the command line with xxd, they all
dumped out a huge chunks of nulls.

My wife has been, for days now, going through each of the cryptic named
files to determine what is there.  Fortunately, she has the iTunes library
on her 80GB iPod and with some freeware that was easily recovered saving
a great about of time (there are close to 10K songs!).  She has all of the
latest pictures still in Aperture so most of the vaults which were stored
on the 1TB LaCie would need to be restored either.  

This has been a horrible experience though.  I am loathe to purchase an-
other LaCie because of this experience.

While we are on the subject, SCSI has length limitations.  Are they such
limitations on Firewire chains and how many devices can I safely connect
in a Fireware chain (I know.... read the specs.)?  If anybody has a quick
answer, please let me know.  I would gladly use several smaller drives in
lieu of one mammoth spindle.

Signature

VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker   VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM
         
 "Well my son, life is like a beanstalk, isn't it?"

http://tmesis.com/drat.html

TaliesinSoft - 18 Aug 2007 11:22 GMT
> In article <0001HW.C2EC57D2001F21D0B019F94F@news.supernews.com>,
> TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@mac.com> writes:

[responding to my opening posting in this thread in which I detailed the
concurrent loss of two external drives on a firewire chain and my internal
drive]

> Aye, to my query about their reliability.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> named but when I looked at them from the command line with xxd, they all
> dumped out a huge chunks of nulls.

I did have the good fortune in having one of the three drives on the firewire
chain survive and that drive hosted a SuperDuper! backup made minutes before
the failure, so all of my data was preserved. After the failure I cloned the
backup data onto an external drive that is connected via firewire 400 (it is
the only device on that chain) and have been booting from that drive.

> My wife has been, for days now, going through each of the cryptic named
> files to determine what is there.  Fortunately, she has the iTunes library
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> answer, please let me know.  I would gladly use several smaller drives in
> lieu of one mammoth spindle.

The three drives on the firewire 800 chain were connected with firewire 800
cables roughly two feet in length each.

Many thanks for taking the time to reply.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

J.J. O'Shea - 18 Aug 2007 15:40 GMT
> While we are on the subject, SCSI has length limitations.  Are they such
> limitations on Firewire chains and how many devices can I safely connect

IIRC, 15 feet max between devices, 240 feet max for entire chain, 63 devices
max on chain.

> in a Fireware chain (I know.... read the specs.)?  If anybody has a quick
> answer, please let me know.  I would gladly use several smaller drives in
> lieu of one mammoth spindle.

Signature

email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.

J.J. O'Shea - 18 Aug 2007 15:39 GMT
> A couple days ago I installed a brand new LaCie 500 GB external drive, adding

> it to my firewire 800 chain which already hosted two LaCie drives, one 500 GB

> and one 160 GB. I'm running on a MacBook Pro and using OS X 10.4.10. The new
> drive was intended to be a recipient of SuperDuper! backups
>
> After connecting the new drive I used Disk Utility to partition it into three

> equal sized volumes. I then proceeded to run SuperDuper! to create a backup
> on one of the partitions. A few minutes into the backup SuperDuper! produced
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> A quick check of things revealed that both the new 500 GB drive and the 160
> GB drive on the firewire chain had undergone failure and would no longer even

> turn on. In addition the internal drive in the MacBook failed.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> posted here in these discussions that I had experienced extremely reliable
> performance from my LaCie drives.

When multiple drives go bye-bye all at once, the first suspect is always
power and the second suspect is always heat. First we'll deal with power, as
that's more likely, given that we're talking three different enclosures (two
external drives and an internal) so heat is unlikely unless your A/C went
dead and you were running the system in 110 degree heat. Was everything
hooked up to the same surge protector or UPS or on the same mains electric
circuit? Did anything else go bye-bye at the same time? Was there an
electrical storm? Did a distribution transformer (either a big object on the
ground if you have underground power cables in your neighborhood, or a large
cylinder on a pole if not) fry? Was there an electrical storm? In particular,
was there an electrical storm with lots of lightening strikes close to your
house?

If one drive died first and sent an electrical pulse down the line and killed
the other drives, I _seriously_ suspect either a mains power fault or
lightening. In either case, I'd check out other items in the house, such as
anything which has an electric motor. Especially fridges.

Signature

email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.

TaliesinSoft - 18 Aug 2007 11:13 GMT
[responding to my opening posting for this thread in which I detailed the  
concurrent loss of three drives, two on a firewire chain, and one internal]

> When multiple drives go bye-bye all at once, the first suspect is always
> power and the second suspect is always heat. First we'll deal with power,
> as that's more likely, given that we're talking three different enclosures
> (two external drives and an internal) so heat is unlikely unless your A/C
> went dead and you were running the system in 110 degree heat.

> Was everything hooked up to the same surge protector or UPS or on the same
> mains electric circuit?

The computer was connected to one Tripp Lite surge protector and the external
drives to another. The surge protectors were connected to a wall outlet.
There were other devices attached to the surge protectors and they were
unaffected.

> Did anything else go bye-bye at the same time?

No.

> Was there an electrical storm?

No.

> Did a distribution transformer (either a big object on the ground if you
> have underground power cables in your neighborhood, or a large cylinder on
> a pole if not) fry?

No.

> Was there an electrical storm? In particular, was there an electrical
> storm with lots of lightening strikes close to your house?

No.

> If one drive died first and sent an electrical pulse down the line and
> killed the other drives, I _seriously_ suspect either a mains power fault
> or lightening. In either case, I'd check out other items in the house,
> such as anything which has an electric motor. Especially fridges.

I have yet to find anything else in the house that was affected.

I am at the moment still convinced that the failure was within either the
newly installed drive or the power brick that came with it. And I strongly
believe what I have been told that a failure in a firewire chain can
propagate to other members of the chain.

Many thanks for taking the time to reply and offer suggestions.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

thepixelfreak - 18 Aug 2007 16:27 GMT
> And I strongly believe what I have been told that a failure in a
> firewire chain can propagate to other members of the chain.
> Many thanks for taking the time to reply and offer suggestions.

This must be an electronic failure (some sort of surge on the firewire
line that fried something on each drives controller board. I've never
seen anything like this with SCSI, FCAL (copper FCAL obviously) SAS or
any other storage protocol. I guess this is the risk you run where the
data medium also supports power.

Signature

thepixelfreak

J.J. O'Shea - 18 Aug 2007 16:27 GMT
> I am at the moment still convinced that the failure was within either the
> newly installed drive or the power brick that came with it. And I strongly
> believe what I have been told that a failure in a firewire chain can
> propagate to other members of the chain.

If the units were on different surge protectors, which still work, and which
had other things attached to them which still work, it really looks bad for
the La Cie. It's still electrical, but now it looks like it's the la Cie
which caused it.

Good luck. I have a feeling that you're going to need it.

Signature

email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.

George Kerby - 19 Aug 2007 00:20 GMT
On 8/18/07 10:27 AM, in article
0001HW.C2EC883104CEB8AEF0509648@newsgroups.comcast.net, "J.J. O'Shea"
<try.not.to@but.see.sig> wrote:

>> I am at the moment still convinced that the failure was within either the
>> newly installed drive or the power brick that came with it. And I strongly
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Good luck. I have a feeling that you're going to need it.

I just went to a local user group (HAAUG.org) meeting today.

The speaker was one of the writers of Alsoft's DiskWarrior. He indicated
that, until the recent widespread use of un-cooled (no fan) 3.5 inch
external drives, directory problems were responsible for 99% of Tech Support
issues.

Now, that people are leaving these large passive heat displaced drives on
for long periods, if not all the time, that more than 15% of the issues are
external FireWire and USB failure - due to overheating. The lubrication and
magnetic properties change due to the excess heat. If it is too hot to
touch, it needs active cooling.

My LaCie 320GB Porsche drive is now turned off and will remain off except
when backing up my main internal drive.

This may not be the problem the OP is having, but is interesting information
that I thought I would pass on to the gang.
Jolly Roger - 19 Aug 2007 00:33 GMT
> The speaker was one of the writers of Alsoft's DiskWarrior. He indicated
> that, until the recent widespread use of un-cooled (no fan) 3.5 inch
> external drives, directory problems were responsible for 99% of Tech Support
> issues.

Were the hard drives the OP was using passively cooled?

Signature

Apply rot13 to this e-mail address before using it.

JR

TaliesinSoft - 18 Aug 2007 20:08 GMT
>> The speaker was one of the writers of Alsoft's DiskWarrior. He indicated
>> that, until the recent widespread use of un-cooled (no fan) 3.5 inch
>> external drives, directory problems were responsible for 99% of Tech Support
>> issues.
>
> Were the hard drives the OP was using passively cooled?

At the time of the failure the three drives on the firewire 800 chain, all
LaCie drives, were passively cooled as was the single LaCie drive connected
via firewire 400. The internal drive was cooled by a fan.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

Jolly Roger - 19 Aug 2007 04:23 GMT
>>> The speaker was one of the writers of Alsoft's DiskWarrior. He indicated
>>> that, until the recent widespread use of un-cooled (no fan) 3.5 inch
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> LaCie drives, were passively cooled as was the single LaCie drive connected
> via firewire 400. The internal drive was cooled by a fan.

Oh dear...  Personally, I don't think I would trust any hard drive
enclosure that relies on just passive cooling!  Drive runs hot - it's a
fact of life!

At any rate, I still don't see how a Firewire power issue would result
in the internal ATA bus going South.

Signature

Apply rot13 to this e-mail address before using it.

JR

Hylton Boothroyd - 18 Aug 2007 22:41 GMT
> The computer was connected to one Tripp Lite surge protector and the external
> drives to another. The surge protectors were connected to a wall outlet.
> There were other devices attached to the surge protectors and they were
> unaffected.

Which reminds me that a few months ago I learned the hard way that one
of my wall sockets was wrongly wired: neutral was live, and live was
neutral.

Sadly, it was the socket from which I'd run my battery backup and surge
protector for several items for several months (correctly loaded I
believe), but with the first power failure the reponse knocked out my
fast ethernet switch.

And having replaced it, my power-off test immediately knocked that one
out.

I concluded that under wrong polarity the protection kit exacerbated the
problem, and that I was mighty fortunate that nothing else was hit.

I now have a plug-in tester for wall-sockets and extension leads.

Signature

Hylton

The Natural Philosopher - 18 Aug 2007 23:16 GMT
>> The computer was connected to one Tripp Lite surge protector and the external
>> drives to another. The surge protectors were connected to a wall outlet.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> I now have a plug-in tester for wall-sockets and extension leads.

So called surge arrestors have little effect on anything that uses a
switched mode power supply anyway. They can usually absorb small surges
and spikes.

Big surges and spikes (lightning strikes/near strikes) burn them out
anyway, and take half the electronics in the house with them.
Madwen - 20 Aug 2007 05:15 GMT
> When multiple drives go bye-bye all at once, the first suspect is always
> power...

This was my thought as well though usually you get some other damaged
electronics/chips/circuit boards concurrently.  Direct physical damage
(ie earthquake) aside, any other explanation seems extremely unlikely.

Not all damaging power surges are immediately noticeable or detectable.  
And some can be generated by faulty power equipment external to the
home.  I don't understand, though, what would cause a hard drive device
to generate an event that would damage other hard drives in the near
vicinity.  Perhaps someone else has some ideas on that.  About the only
thing I could think of was the transformers that come with many FW
drives to convert AC to DC.  With several external drives plus their
transformers emitting possibly considerable induction if placed close
together (or insufficiently shielded), might that be enough to cause
such an event?

I've heard it said that electrical damage from storms can accrue over
time in electronics, depending on the device of course, doing small
amounts of damage even long before the device finally fails.  And, a
storm need not be in the immediate vicinity to send a surge quite a
distance up the line.  I lost a modem like that once--- heard the static
click-of-death in the computer before I heard the clap of thunder some
distance off.  And lightning is not the only culprit.  Ionization alone
can damage electronics (especially garage openers).  When you smell
ozone, beware!  

We live in an extremely lightning/storm prone area so, after $$$ of
damaged electronics, we had lightning terminals installed as well as
whole-house surge protectors at the main.  Device based surge protectors
are not a very good defense at all.  

We had one Lacie drive that failed only a few weeks after the warranty
was up.  Never again.  I've had much better luck with my 3 OWC FW
externals and a couple of Seagate internals.  However, I do not keep my
FWs running all the time since they are mainly for backup and since all
these devices generate heat and use power.  I also often let my second
internal spin down (by "ejecting " it) and then remounting it as needed
via the Terminal.  I hope the OP posts the final outcome on this issue;
I'd really be interested to know the cause of his multiple concurrent
drive failures.

> ...and the second suspect is always heat. First we'll deal with power, as
> that's more likely, given that we're talking three different enclosures (two
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> lightening. In either case, I'd check out other items in the house, such as
> anything which has an electric motor. Especially fridges.
TaliesinSoft - 20 Aug 2007 16:28 GMT
Madwen,

I certainly appreciate your taking the time to make such a thorough and
detailed addition to this thread.

As things now stand and as I've indicated in my other postings in the thread
I'm currently convinced that the failure of the new firewire 800 external
drive, the other firewire 800 external drive, and the internal drive were all
related to the failure of the new firewire 800 drive, a failure that occurred
within minutes of that drive being installed. I have been told that the
trouble would likely have been propagated via the shared power circuitry of
the firewire  connection and of the hosting computer.

At the time of the failure there was no indication of any electrical problems
affecting the room where the failure occurred. That room contains two
computers and a myriad of peripherals including two printers, a scanner, two
computer attached speaker systems. The other computer in the room was on at
the time of the failure and none of its drives, the internal and two external
firewire 400 drives, were affected. The power for all of the computing
equipment is connected through surge protectors, none of which gave any
indication of trouble.

As of this time I have yet to receive a response from LaCie indicating what
action they will take to address the problem.

Again, many thanks!

Jim

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

Madwen - 20 Aug 2007 20:41 GMT
> Madwen,
>
> I certainly appreciate your taking the time to make such a thorough and
> detailed addition to this thread.

You're welcome but I'm afraid I was far more tangential than helpful.  
Having lost mucho dollars to electrical anomalies, I am very empathetic
however.  Absent any other event, the fact that your drives went
belly-up immediately after turning on the new drive certainly seems
indicative.  I'm still thinking bad transformer on the new drive and it
seems like that could be tested.  I am also worried that, if my
hypothesis is correct, you might have other damage that has not shown up
as yet.

> As things now stand and as I've indicated in my other postings in the thread
> I'm currently convinced that the failure of the new firewire 800 external
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Jim
TaliesinSoft - 20 Aug 2007 22:35 GMT
> In article <0001HW.C2EF1C160002B40EB019F94F@news.supernews.com>,
> TaliesinSoft <taliesinsoft@mac.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> could be tested.  I am also worried that, if my hypothesis is correct, you
> might have other damage that has not shown up as yet.

Madwen,

Many thanks for the "tangential" but indeed "helpful" reply!

The MacBook Pro has been thoroughly checked by Apple and it appears that the
only damage was to the internal drive, and that will be replaced by Apple in
the next few days. The one failed external drive is being replaced under
warranty and I guess I'm out of luck in regards to the older one for which
warranty has expired.

Jim

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

Jolly Roger - 20 Aug 2007 23:04 GMT
> The MacBook Pro has been thoroughly checked by Apple and it appears that the
> only damage was to the internal drive, and that will be replaced by Apple in
> the next few days. The one failed external drive is being replaced under
> warranty and I guess I'm out of luck in regards to the older one for which
> warranty has expired.

If that's LaCie's official stance, there's nothing stopping you from
popping the hood on that old drive and seeing if the hard drive within
it is still functional.

Signature

Apply rot13 to this e-mail address before using it.

JR

TaliesinSoft - 21 Aug 2007 00:02 GMT
>> The MacBook Pro has been thoroughly checked by Apple and it appears that the
>> only damage was to the internal drive, and that will be replaced by Apple in
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> popping the hood on that old drive and seeing if the hard drive within
> it is still functional.

Opening the drive enclosure to check whether the failure is the disk or the
controller is exactly what the service person at LaCie suggested.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

The Natural Philosopher - 21 Aug 2007 10:03 GMT
>>> The MacBook Pro has been thoroughly checked by Apple and it appears that the
>>> only damage was to the internal drive, and that will be replaced by Apple in
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Opening the drive enclosure to check whether the failure is the disk or the
> controller is exactly what the service person at LaCie suggested.

If you know what you are doing, and if the drive is the same as a newer
working one, you can temporarily swap  the drive controller boards on
the drives to get data off the old disk..

Only do this as a last resort tho:
TaliesinSoft - 21 Aug 2007 15:34 GMT
>>>> The MacBook Pro has been thoroughly checked by Apple and it appears that
>>>> the
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Only do this as a last resort tho:

Fortunately, I maintain a backup procedure where by swapping disks the
absolute worst that can happen to me is to lose a single days work. I also
have multiple backups that are made nigtly. When I experienced the disk
failure one of those nightly backup disks survived, so there was absolutely
no loss of data, The current downside is that until I replace the failed
internal drive (any day now) I have to drag around an external firewire 400
dirve, and until I replace the two failed external drives (one to be replaced
today) I don't have the level of security in my backup regime that I would
like.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

Jolly Roger - 18 Aug 2007 16:47 GMT
> My question is whether I should expect LaCie to absorb the cost of replacing
> the two dead external drives, and the dead internal drive? The other damaged
> external drive was also a LaCie.

I would expect them to replace the other drives if it is determined
that their drive was at fault.  Determining that may not be easy.

You mention the external enclosures won't power up, but are the actual
hard drives inside of the enclosures still operational?

Signature

Apply rot13 to this e-mail address before using it.

JR

TaliesinSoft - 18 Aug 2007 11:58 GMT
>> My question is whether I should expect LaCie to absorb the cost of replacing
>> the two dead external drives, and the dead internal drive? The other damaged
>> external drive was also a LaCie.
>
> I would expect them to replace the other drives if it is determined
> that their drive was at fault.  Determining that may not be easy.

The three drive failures appear to have been  concurrent. Immediately after
receiving the failure message from SuperDuper! the drives were no longer
accessible via Disk Utility.

> You mention the external enclosures won't power up, but are the actual
> hard drives inside of the enclosures still operational?

Without breaking the warranty seal is there any way to tell if the drive is
still operational? The two dead external drives came equipped with a blue
status light that goes on when the drive is connected and which flickers when
there is activity. That light now remains totally off.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

Jolly Roger - 18 Aug 2007 17:05 GMT
>>> My question is whether I should expect LaCie to absorb the cost of replacing
>>> the two dead external drives, and the dead internal drive? The other damaged
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> receiving the failure message from SuperDuper! the drives were no longer
> accessible via Disk Utility.

Yes, I think the trick will be getting LaCie to admit fault. I think
you'll be somewhat at the whim of their technical support personnel and
policies.  : /  Hopefully you find a nice contact there who is willing
to admit fault and rectify the situation. It goes without saying it's
in your best interests to remain calm, cool, and collected when you
speak with them about the problem.

>> You mention the external enclosures won't power up, but are the actual
>> hard drives inside of the enclosures still operational?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> status light that goes on when the drive is connected and which flickers when
> there is activity. That light now remains totally off.

Yeah, unfortunately, you'd have to take the drive out of the case to
see if the drive is affected. My gut feeling is the drives may be okay,
which is why I asked.  LaCie's external enclosure power supplies have a
horrid track record in my experience.

Signature

Apply rot13 to this e-mail address before using it.

JR

TaliesinSoft - 18 Aug 2007 12:18 GMT
[in the context of my feeling that LaCie should take responsibility for the
concurrent failure I experienced with three drives and which was detailed in
the opening posting of this thread]

> Yes, I think the trick will be getting LaCie to admit fault. I think
> you'll be somewhat at the whim of their technical support personnel and
> policies.  : /  Hopefully you find a nice contact there who is willing
> to admit fault and rectify the situation. It goes without saying it's
> in your best interests to remain calm, cool, and collected when you
> speak with them about the problem.

I have reported the problem on the LaCie support web page and have followed
and reported back to them on each of the suggestions they have offered. At
this time there has been no discussion regarding replacement of the three
drives. And, methinks I have indeed been "calm, cool, and collected" in my
communications with LaCie.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

TaliesinSoft - 18 Aug 2007 12:23 GMT
[commenting on how one could determine if the disk within a LaCie external
drive was still functioning]

> Yeah, unfortunately, you'd have to take the drive out of the case to
> see if the drive is affected. My gut feeling is the drives may be okay,
> which is why I asked.  LaCie's external enclosure power supplies have a
> horrid track record in my experience.

Interestingly I still have some access to the failed internal drive.
Yesterday I used Disk Utility to write all zeros to the drive. Following that
I ran a SuperDuper! restore to the drive. The restoration appeared to have
run without a problem but when I attempted to boot from the drive I got a
kernel panic. Subsequent to that I booted from an external drive and just
taking a look at the drive via Finder showed that it was in bad order.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

Jolly Roger - 18 Aug 2007 19:24 GMT
> [commenting on how one could determine if the disk within a LaCie external
> drive was still functioning]
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> kernel panic. Subsequent to that I booted from an external drive and just
> taking a look at the drive via Finder showed that it was in bad order.

Yeah, see I wonder if the Firewire interface is damaged due to the
power problem, but the ATA hard drive inside the case is still okay.

Signature

Apply rot13 to this e-mail address before using it.

JR

TaliesinSoft - 18 Aug 2007 14:54 GMT
>> [commenting on how one could determine if the disk within a LaCie external
>> drive was still functioning]
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Yeah, see I wonder if the Firewire interface is damaged due to the power
> problem, but the ATA hard drive inside the case is still okay.

At this time I can connect one external drive (which only supports firewire
400) and one external drive (which supports both firewire 400 and 800). These
drives appear to be operating without problems. They pass Disk Utility
verification. The internal drive shows up in Disk Utility but is clearly
hosed. The other two external drives (which both support firewire 400 and
800) do not indicate connection when connected. I'm hesitant at this time to
open these two external drives until things are settled with LaCie. As for
the internal drive Apple has agreed to replace it under warranty.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

Jolly Roger - 18 Aug 2007 20:31 GMT
> The internal drive shows up in Disk Utility but is clearly
> hosed.
(snip)
> As for
> the internal drive Apple has agreed to replace it under warranty.

I can't see how the failure of the internal drive would be related to
the Firewire drive failures.

Signature

Apply rot13 to this e-mail address before using it.

JR

TaliesinSoft - 18 Aug 2007 15:38 GMT
>> The internal drive shows up in Disk Utility but is clearly
>> hosed.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> I can't see how the failure of the internal drive would be related to
> the Firewire drive failures.

I have been told by someone who seems to be quite versed in such things that
the internal drive could indeed have been affected by a failure propagated
via firewire. All I can say is that the failure of the internal drive
occurred at the same time as the failure of the two external drives.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

Jolly Roger - 18 Aug 2007 20:56 GMT
>>> The internal drive shows up in Disk Utility but is clearly
>>> hosed.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> via firewire. All I can say is that the failure of the internal drive
> occurred at the same time as the failure of the two external drives.

How?  The Firewire drives are connected to the Firewire bus.  The
internal drive, whether it be SATA or ATA, is connected to the ATA bus.
Those are two separate busses.

Signature

Apply rot13 to this e-mail address before using it.

JR

TaliesinSoft - 18 Aug 2007 18:13 GMT
>>>> The internal drive shows up in Disk Utility but is clearly
>>>> hosed.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> internal drive, whether it be SATA or ATA, is connected to the ATA bus.
> Those are two separate busses.

I'll see if I can get a clarification from my friend as to how the firewire
failure could affect the internal drive.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

TaliesinSoft - 18 Aug 2007 20:11 GMT
> I'll see if I can get a clarification from my friend as to how the
> firewire failure could affect the internal drive.

Here's what he had to  say.....

Although only an Apple engineer could divine the true cause, I suspect that
it was a power issue that caused the component failures.  Although the DATA
paths are different -- there are common POWER feeds.  Anecdotally, compute
the odds of THREE drives, of different manufacturers and ages, passing into
the great beyond at the same time -- and NOT having a common factor. And the
problematic power supplies on LaCie drives is documented. Also the logic
board survives and seems happy in all other respects, i.e. with new proven
drives on the same (failed) bus.  If not, I'd suspect logic board.  Sorry for
the convoluted thought process... its just the way I reason thru quandries
such as yours.... just my $.02

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

Ockham's Razor - 19 Aug 2007 01:54 GMT
> > I'll see if I can get a clarification from my friend as to how the
> > firewire failure could affect the internal drive.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> the convoluted thought process... its just the way I reason thru quandries
> such as yours.... just my $.02

Just a simple question.  did you try Disk Warrior?  My internal HD
seemed hosed some years ago and in the process of trying everything
else, I used DW with the system booted from the DW disk.  After a long
period it was able to do what ever it does and voila everything was
working normally again (and has continued to do so).  Running 10.3.9 on
a G5 iMac.

Hope this is not too simple minded for this problem.

Signature

Es ist nichts schrecklicher als eine tatige Unwissenheit.

                                     Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

TaliesinSoft - 18 Aug 2007 22:06 GMT
[in the context of my failed internal drive which has been described in
preceding postings in this thread]

> Just a simple question.  did you try Disk Warrior?  My internal HD seemed
> hosed some years ago and in the process of trying everything else, I used
> DW with the system booted from the DW disk.  After a long period it was
> able to do what ever it does and voila everything was working normally
> again (and has continued to do so).  Running 10.3.9 on a G5 iMac.

Thanks for joining the discussion!

When I took the laptop to the Apple store they tried a disk rescue program,
Drive Genius from ProSoft, and it didn't help.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

Ockham's Razor - 20 Aug 2007 00:56 GMT
> [in the context of my failed internal drive which has been described in
> preceding postings in this thread]
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> When I took the laptop to the Apple store they tried a disk rescue program,
> Drive Genius from ProSoft, and it didn't help.

I don't think DW is a disk rescue program.  Does Drive Genius do what
Disk Warrior does to the directory. From What I have heard, a severe
directory problem will make a computer un-bootable.  

Might be worth a shot.

But, then, alas, like too many times in the past I could be very wrong.

Signature

Es ist nichts schrecklicher als eine tatige Unwissenheit.

                                     Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

TaliesinSoft - 19 Aug 2007 21:36 GMT
> I don't think DW is a disk rescue program.  Does Drive Genius do what
> Disk Warrior does to the directory. From What I have heard, a severe
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> But, then, alas, like too many times in the past I could be very wrong.

As things currently stand I'm booting off an external firewire 400 drive that
wasn't affected by the multi-drive crash. I was fortunate at the time of the
crash to have two backup clones of the failed internal drives, so I didn't
suffer any data loss.

Since the failure several attempts have been made to see if the internal
drive could be restored, but these attempts have all failed. I'm hoping that
Apple will be able to replace the internal drive early in the week. I'm still
waiting to hear from LaCie regarding what replacements they will make in
regards to the two failed external drives.

Signature

James Leo Ryan ..... Austin, Texas ..... taliesinsoft@mac.com

Jolly Roger - 19 Aug 2007 04:29 GMT
>> I'll see if I can get a clarification from my friend as to how the
>> firewire failure could affect the internal drive.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> it was a power issue that caused the component failures.  Although the DATA
> paths are different -- there are common POWER feeds.

It sounds like your friend is saying that a power problem in one of the
Firewire drive enclosures could somehow effect the power supply of your
computer or the power supply of the internal (S)ATA drive.  But if he's
talking about the Firewire bus power, then I don't see how that would
be connected to the power lead of the internal ATA drive.  Or, if he's
talking about the wall outlet power lead to the external drive, I don't
see the connection to the internal ATA drive either.

Signature

Apply rot13 to this e-mail address before using it.

JR

The Natural Philosopher - 18 Aug 2007 23:26 GMT
>>>>> The internal drive shows up in Disk Utility but is clearly
>>>>> hosed.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> I'll see if I can get a clarification from my friend as to how the firewire
> failure could affect the internal drive.

They don't call it 'firewire' for nothing.

"Light the end of the Fire Wire, Sergeant"

"Yussir"

BANG! BANG! BANG!

"All drives successfully detonated, Sir!"

"Carry on Sergeant!"

Just wait till you get a lightning strike on yer phone line..haha.

"Hey, this bit still works" "Wonder how it missed THAT then?"
Jolly Roger - 19 Aug 2007 00:36 GMT
> Just wait till you get a lightning strike on yer phone line..haha.
>
> "Hey, this bit still works" "Wonder how it missed THAT then?"

Being from New Orleans, I can say I've been there, done that (multiple
times), and bought massive UPSs to prevent it from happening again.

Signature

Apply rot13 to this e-mail address before using it.

JR

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.