> > In article <1184070976.939992.27...@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I cant believe the tech guys at Apple couldnt tell me that straight
> up.
They may not have understood that you were trying to connect to to
machines concurrently. Depends a lot on how you phrased your statements.
> Can you explain why there are 2 FireWire ports on the HD?
For chaining additional devices.
> Also can you elaborate on Target Disk Mode.. i.e What is this mode
> intended for?
It's intended as a means for one machine to use a different machine's
internal drive as local storage. You invoke it by holding down the T key
on the machine you want to use as a drive while it's booting. You'll
eventually see a mostly-blank screen with a FireWire logo jumping around
on it.
> Is it safe to work form this mode?
Um. Generally, yes. That's what it's there for. What particular kind of
work do you have in mind?
> Which machine would be
> better off in Target Mode?
Whichever one you don't want to actually be sitting at as an operator.
> Or better yet. Is there another workaround,
> like software or firmware that will fix this issue?
No. FireWire is not a network file system. You'd pretty much have to
introduce new hardware to own the drive and arbitrate access to it.
J.J. O'Shea - 10 Jul 2007 14:40 GMT
>>> In article <1184070976.939992.27...@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> No. FireWire is not a network file system. You'd pretty much have to
> introduce new hardware to own the drive and arbitrate access to it.
Ah, no. All you need is IP over FireWire. That's been around since at least
Jaguar, and was much better supported under Panther and later.
<http://forums.macosxhints.com/archive/index.php/t-18018.html> It's also
supported (poorly) by W2K and (much better) by WinXP and Vista.

Signature
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
Gregory Weston - 10 Jul 2007 19:02 GMT
> >> Or better yet. Is there another workaround,
> >> like software or firmware that will fix this issue?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> <http://forums.macosxhints.com/archive/index.php/t-18018.html> It's also
> supported (poorly) by W2K and (much better) by WinXP and Vista.
No, that's not all you need. That's an answer to a different question.
IPFW lets hosts communicate with each other using FireWire as the
physical layer. But you'd still need something to get the FireWire drive
to act as a host and something to arbitrate access to the platters in
that scenario. Look carefully at what you wrote: IPFW is supported by OS
X and Windows. Now what's the OS running on the HD that lets it
participate?
Now, that said, I presumed that the OP knew about the possibility of
sharing a drive over a LAN and for some reason found that insufficient
to his needs. (Such as not wanting to commit to having a high-load host
machine on/awake at all times.) If that presumption is flawed, then yes:
All he needs to do is establish a network between the machines and he
won't actually need extra hardware beyond a cable.