Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / General / Hardware / July 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

External HD only showing on one Mac

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
marckatsambis@gmail.com - 10 Jul 2007 13:36 GMT
Hi all,

I curently own a G4 PowerbBook (OS 10.4.10) and just bought a G5 Mac
Pro (OS 10.4.10). I also have a Macpower IceCube 3.5" 320GB HD with 2
S400 Firewire ports.

Currently the Ex HD has no problems showing up on my PowerBook (as it
always has). But when connected to both machines it will only show up
on one or the other (depending on which machine detects it first).
I've called Apple Support, but the only thing they could suggest doing
was reformatting the Ex HD from a FAT 32 file system to Mac Extended
(Journaled) file system. So I tried that, and still no luck - then
they suggested it must be an issue with the thrid party product seeing
that both machines can physically recognise the drive. And from what I
can telll MacPower doesnt have any support relating to this particular
drive.

Looking in System profiler on both machines - They both claim to have
an OXFORD IDE Device which I can only assume is the HD.

Does anyone know whats going on or how I can fix this? I figure if
there are 2 firewire ports, I should be able to share the drive on 2
machines... correct?

Here are my specs for both machines:

G4 Powerbook
Machine Name:    PowerBook G4 15"
Machine Model:    PowerBook5,8
CPU Type:    PowerPC G4 (1.5)
Number Of CPUs:    1
CPU Speed:    1.67 GHz
L2 Cache (per CPU):    512 KB
Memory:    1 GB
Bus Speed:    167 MHz
Boot ROM Version:    4.9.5f3
Serial Number:
Sudden Motion Sensor:
State:    Enabled

FireWire Bus:

Maximum Speed:    Up to 800 Mb/sec

Unknown Device:

Manufacturer:    Unknown
Model:    Unknown Device
Maximum Speed:    Up to 800 Mb/sec
Connection Speed:    Unknown

Unknown Device:

Manufacturer:    Unknown
Model:    Unknown Device
Maximum Speed:    Up to 800 Mb/sec
Connection Speed:    Unknown

Unknown Device:

Manufacturer:    Unknown
Model:    Unknown Device
Maximum Speed:    Up to 400 Mb/sec
Connection Speed:    Up to 400 Mb/sec

OXFORD IDE Device 1:

Manufacturer:    Macpower
Model:    0x0
GUID:    0x1D202E0102066
Maximum Speed:    Up to 400 Mb/sec
Connection Speed:    Up to 400 Mb/sec
Sub-units:
OXFORD IDE Device 1 Unit:
Unit Software Version:    0x10483
Unit Spec ID:    0x609E
Firmware Revision:    0x102
Product Revision Level:    08.0
Sub-units:
OXFORD IDE Device 1 SBP-LUN:
Capacity:    298.09 GB
Removable Media:    Yes
BSD Name:    disk1
OS9 Drivers:    Yes
S.M.A.R.T. status:    Not Supported
Volumes:
Koodoz:
Capacity:    297.96 GB
Available:    282.77 GB
Writable:    Yes
File System:    Journaled HFS+
BSD Name:    disk1s10
Mount Point:    /Volumes/Koodoz

G5 MacPro
Model Name: Mac Pro
Model Identifier: MacPro1,1
Processor Name: Dual-Core Intel Xeon
Processor Speed: 2.66 GHz
Number Of Processors: 2
Total Number Of Cores: 4
L2 Cache (per processor): 4 MB
Memory: 2 GB
Bus Speed: 1.33 GHz
Boot ROM Version: MP11.005C.B04
SMC Version: 1.7f8

FireWire Bus:

Maximum Speed: Up to 800 Mb/sec

Built-in Hub:

Manufacturer: Unknown
Model: Unknown Device
Maximum Speed: Up to 800 Mb/sec
Connection Speed: Unknown

Unknown Device:

Manufacturer: Unknown
Model: Unknown Device
Maximum Speed: Up to 400 Mb/sec
Connection Speed: Unknown

OXFORD IDE Device 1:

Manufacturer: Macpower
Model: 0x0
GUID: 0x1D202E0102066
Maximum Speed: Up to 400 Mb/sec
Connection Speed: Up to 400 Mb/sec
Sub-units:
OXFORD IDE Device 1 Unit:
Unit Software Version: 0x10483
Unit Spec ID: 0x609E
Firmware Revision: 0x102
Sub-units:
OXFORD IDE Device 1 SBP-LUN:

Macintosh:

Manufacturer: Apple Computer, Inc.
Model: 0xA
GUID: 0x1451FFFE1CD66A
Maximum Speed: Up to 800 Mb/sec
Connection Speed: Up to 400 Mb/sec
Sub-units:
Macintosh Unit:
Unit Software Version: 0x1
Unit Spec ID: 0x5E
Macintosh Unit:
Unit Software Version: 0x2
Unit Spec ID: 0x5E
Tom Stiller - 10 Jul 2007 13:46 GMT
> Hi all,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> can telll MacPower doesnt have any support relating to this particular
> drive.

How do you intend to use this configuration?  FireWire is not intended
to support more than on controller.  As you've described the connection,
One Mac could be started in Target Disk Mode and the other Mac would see
both the external drive and the other Mac's internal drive.

You will not be able to use the external drive as a storage pool for
both Macs concurrently.
marckatsambis@gmail.com - 10 Jul 2007 14:07 GMT
> In article <1184070976.939992.27...@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,

> You will not be able to use the external drive as a storage pool for
> both Macs concurrently.

Thanks Tom,

I cant believe the tech guys at Apple couldnt tell me that straight
up.

Can you explain why there are 2 FireWire ports on the HD?

Also can you elaborate on Target Disk Mode.. i.e What is this mode
intended for? Is it safe o work form this mode? Which machine would be
better off in Target Mode? Or better yet. Is there another workaround,
like software or firmware that will fix this issue?

Cheers,

Marc
Gregory Weston - 10 Jul 2007 14:19 GMT
> > In article <1184070976.939992.27...@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I cant believe the tech guys at Apple couldnt tell me that straight
> up.

They may not have understood that you were trying to connect to to
machines concurrently. Depends a lot on how you phrased your statements.

> Can you explain why there are 2 FireWire ports on the HD?

For chaining additional devices.

> Also can you elaborate on Target Disk Mode.. i.e What is this mode
> intended for?

It's intended as a means for one machine to use a different machine's
internal drive as local storage. You invoke it by holding down the T key
on the machine you want to use as a drive while it's booting. You'll
eventually see a mostly-blank screen with a FireWire logo jumping around
on it.

> Is it safe to work form this mode?

Um. Generally, yes. That's what it's there for. What particular kind of
work do you have in mind?

> Which machine would be
> better off in Target Mode?

Whichever one you don't want to actually be sitting at as an operator.

> Or better yet. Is there another workaround,
> like software or firmware that will fix this issue?

No. FireWire is not a network file system. You'd pretty much have to
introduce new hardware to own the drive and arbitrate access to it.
J.J. O'Shea - 10 Jul 2007 14:40 GMT
>>> In article <1184070976.939992.27...@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> No. FireWire is not a network file system. You'd pretty much have to
> introduce new hardware to own the drive and arbitrate access to it.

Ah, no. All you need is IP over FireWire. That's been around since at least
Jaguar, and was much better supported under Panther and later.
<http://forums.macosxhints.com/archive/index.php/t-18018.html> It's also
supported (poorly) by W2K and (much better) by WinXP and Vista.

Signature

email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.

Gregory Weston - 10 Jul 2007 19:02 GMT
> >> Or better yet. Is there another workaround,
> >> like software or firmware that will fix this issue?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> <http://forums.macosxhints.com/archive/index.php/t-18018.html> It's also
> supported (poorly) by W2K and (much better) by WinXP and Vista.

No, that's not all you need. That's an answer to a different question.
IPFW lets hosts communicate with each other using FireWire as the
physical layer. But you'd still need something to get the FireWire drive
to act as a host and something to arbitrate access to the platters in
that scenario. Look carefully at what you wrote: IPFW is supported by OS
X and Windows. Now what's the OS running on the HD that lets it
participate?

Now, that said, I presumed that the OP knew about the possibility of
sharing a drive over a LAN and for some reason found that insufficient
to his needs. (Such as not wanting to commit to having a high-load host
machine on/awake at all times.) If that presumption is flawed, then yes:
All he needs to do is establish a network between the machines and he
won't actually need extra hardware beyond a cable.
Christoph Gartmann - 10 Jul 2007 14:10 GMT
>I curently own a G4 PowerbBook (OS 10.4.10) and just bought a G5 Mac
>Pro (OS 10.4.10). I also have a Macpower IceCube 3.5" 320GB HD with 2
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>there are 2 firewire ports, I should be able to share the drive on 2
>machines... correct?

No, sharing a drive between two computers is a lot more complicated.
Either both computers need to know about each other and the drive or
the drive needs an intelligent controller.

Regards,
  Christoph Gartmann

Signature

Max-Planck-Institut fuer      Phone   : +49-761-5108-464   Fax: -452
Immunbiologie
Postfach 1169                 Internet: gartmann@immunbio dot mpg dot de
D-79011  Freiburg, Germany
              http://www.immunbio.mpg.de/home/menue.html

marckatsambis@gmail.com - 10 Jul 2007 14:15 GMT
> No, sharing a drive between two computers is a lot more complicated.
> Either both computers need to know about each other and the drive or
> the drive needs an intelligent controller.

Christoph,

Can you point me in the right direction to either of these methods?

Cheers,

Marc
Christoph Gartmann - 10 Jul 2007 14:32 GMT
>> No, sharing a drive between two computers is a lot more complicated.
>> Either both computers need to know about each other and the drive or
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Can you point me in the right direction to either of these methods?

The first possibility is a matter of the operating system. The second one
is something that is commonly known as NAS (networked attached storage).
I am not aware of any solution via Firewire for neither of the two
possibilities.

An example that might do what you need is a "Snapserver 110".

Regards,
  Christoph Gartmann

Signature

Max-Planck-Institut fuer      Phone   : +49-761-5108-464   Fax: -452
Immunbiologie
Postfach 1169                 Internet: gartmann@immunbio dot mpg dot de
D-79011  Freiburg, Germany
              http://www.immunbio.mpg.de/home/menue.html

J.J. O'Shea - 10 Jul 2007 14:41 GMT
>> No, sharing a drive between two computers is a lot more complicated.
>> Either both computers need to know about each other and the drive or
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Marc

Googling 'firewire network mac' will reveal much.

Signature

email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.

J.J. O'Shea - 10 Jul 2007 14:37 GMT
> Does anyone know whats going on or how I can fix this? I figure if
> there are 2 firewire ports, I should be able to share the drive on 2
> machines... correct?

You appear to be trying to use FireWire as a networking system. This can be
done... just not with Macs running anything earlier than Panther
<http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/mac/2003/11/11/panther_internet.html>. You'd
have to configure the drive as a NAS device, with an IP of its own. You can't
have any one FireWire cable longer than 15 feet, and you can't exceed 240
(237, officially) feet in total for your entire network. Or you could
configure one port to have an IP and attach the drive to the other port, and
mount it as a share point. That could be done with Jaguar.
<http://forums.macosxhints.com/archive/index.php/t-18018.html>

Signature

email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.