Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / General / Hardware / May 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

a DIMM mystery - SOS

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Paul Nevai - 22 May 2007 02:32 GMT
I need urgent advice...please...

I bought a 1 GB DDR2 SDRAM with speed

                PC2-4200S-444

DIMM for my 1.67 GHz Aluminum PowerBook G4 but it shows up as a

                PC2-3200S-288

in the System Profiler. The seller tells me that

#############################################################################
Apple system profiler has issues properly reading third party memory. It has
been this way for some time the memory performs properly but is read wrong.
#############################################################################

QUESTION 1. Could the seller's explanation be correct?

QUESTION 2. How can I determine if in fact the memory performs as a
PC2-4200S-444 and not as a PC2-3200S-288?

Thanks! /PaulN
tacit - 22 May 2007 04:25 GMT
> QUESTION 2. How can I determine if in fact the memory performs as a
> PC2-4200S-444 and not as a PC2-3200S-288?

I seem to recall that the Aluminum Powerbook models did not use PC4200
memory; their RAM bus was PC2700. If that is the case, then you can put
faster memory in there, and it will work, but at the slower speed.

Signature

Photography, kink, polyamory, shareware, and more: all at
http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html

Paul Nevai - 22 May 2007 11:19 GMT
In comp.sys.mac.system tacit <tacitr@aol.com> wrote:

> > QUESTION 2. How can I determine if in fact the memory performs as a
> > PC2-4200S-444 and not as a PC2-3200S-288?

> I seem to recall that the Aluminum Powerbook models did not use PC4200
> memory; their RAM bus was PC2700. If that is the case, then you can put
> faster memory in there, and it will work, but at the slower speed.

Nope, they use PC4200. Sorry. /PaulN
Mike Rosenberg - 22 May 2007 13:20 GMT
> > I seem to recall that the Aluminum Powerbook models did not use PC4200
> > memory; their RAM bus was PC2700. If that is the case, then you can put
> > faster memory in there, and it will work, but at the slower speed.
>
> Nope, they use PC4200. Sorry.

Take a look at this:

http://www.datamemorysystems.com/AMM12.asp

They say some 1.67 GHz Aluminum PowerBook G4s use PC2700 and some use
PC2-4200.

Signature

<http://designsbymike.biz/macconsultshop.shtml> Mac-themed T-shirts
<http://designsbymike.biz/musings.shtml> Humorous/muckraking T-shirts
<http://designsbymike.biz/prius.shtml> Prius shirts & bumper stickers
<http://cafepress.com/comedancing> Ballroom dance-themed shirts & gift

Niels Jørgen Kruse - 22 May 2007 13:58 GMT
> > > I seem to recall that the Aluminum Powerbook models did not use PC4200
> > > memory; their RAM bus was PC2700. If that is the case, then you can put
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> They say some 1.67 GHz Aluminum PowerBook G4s use PC2700 and some use
> PC2-4200.

The DDR2 PowerBooks used PC2-4200, but underclocked it to PC2-2700. See
<http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Hardware/Developer_Notes/Macin
tosh_CPUs-G4/15inchPowerBookG4/index.html>

Signature

Mvh./Regards,    Niels Jørgen Kruse,    Vanløse, Denmark

thepixelfreak - 22 May 2007 18:27 GMT
> In comp.sys.mac.system tacit <tacitr@aol.com> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Nope, they use PC4200. Sorry. /PaulN

Actually. The document that came with my 1.5GHz 15" AL powerbook
clearly states...

PC 2700 DDR 333 SO-DIMM

Further, if you go to a _reputable_ memory vendor like Crucial or
Kingston you'll see they recommend the PC 2700 SO-DIMMS as well. e.g.

http://www.crucial.com/store/listparts.aspx?model=PowerBook+G4+1%2E5GHz+%2815%2D
inch+Display%29


http://www.ec.kingston.com/ecom/configurator_new/modelsinfo.asp?SysID=16683&mfr=
Apple&model=PowerBook+G4+15&root=&LinkBack=&Sys=16683-Apple-PowerBook+G4+15-inch
+1.0-1.67GHz+%28PC2700%29&distributor=0&submit1=Search


Now

http://www.ec.kingston.com/ecom/configurator_new/modelsinfo.asp?SysID=16683&mfr=
Apple&model=PowerBook+G4+15&root=&LinkBack=&Sys=16683-Apple-PowerBook+G4+15-inch
+1.0-1.67GHz+%28PC2700%29&distributor=0&submit1=Search


Now

Now the 1.67 15 and 17 inch AL powerbooks do take the PC 4200 SO-DIMMS.

Go search based on your model and you'll get the straight scoop.

Signature

thepixelfreak

Paul Nevai - 23 May 2007 02:18 GMT
In comp.sys.mac.system thepixelfreak <not@dot.com> wrote:

> > In comp.sys.mac.system tacit <tacitr@aol.com> wrote:

> Now the 1.67 15 and 17 inch AL powerbooks do take the PC 4200 SO-DIMMS.

That's what I keep saying. /PaulN
Gregory Weston - 22 May 2007 12:14 GMT
> I need urgent advice...please...
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> QUESTION 1. Could the seller's explanation be correct?

Doesn't sound right to me. It sounds like you've either got memory that
_is_ slower that what you paid for and need, or that's claiming to be.
Either way I'd return it and find a better vendor.

Where'd you buy the stuff you have?
Xavier Llobet - 22 May 2007 13:15 GMT
> I need urgent advice...please...
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> QUESTION 1. Could the seller's explanation be correct?

Highly suspicious. Ask him for a reference.

> QUESTION 2. How can I determine if in fact the memory performs as a
> PC2-4200S-444 and not as a PC2-3200S-288?

Google is your friend.

Check out the DIMM manufacturer's specs, or the chips themselves.

Example:

I have on my desk an Apacer RAM module with a label 512MB UNB PC3200 CL3,
so it claims to be a PC-3200, Clock Latency=3.

If the label was missing, I would take a look at the chips: 16 chips
Infineon of the type HYB25D256800BT-5 (you may need a magnifying glass).
I google for that, and the first match is

http://www.intel.com/technology/memory/ddr/specs/DS_256M_D14_5_v0.9.pdf

where I can find that those chips are of the type DDR400, 3-3-3, able to
operate at 200MHz. Going to the Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDR_SDRAM

(I am sure there are other references) I can see that the memory at
200MHz using DDR400 chips is called PC-3200. The label is then correct.

> Thanks! /PaulN

FWIW.

_x.

--
Only one "o" in my e-mail address
Paul Nevai - 22 May 2007 14:09 GMT
In comp.sys.mac.system Xavier Llobet <Xavier.Lloobet@epfl.ch> wrote:

> > I need urgent advice...please...
> >
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> >
> > QUESTION 1. Could the seller's explanation be correct?

> Highly suspicious. Ask him for a reference.
>  
> > QUESTION 2. How can I determine if in fact the memory performs as a
> > PC2-4200S-444 and not as a PC2-3200S-288?

> Google is your friend.

> Check out the DIMM manufacturer's specs, or the chips themselves.

> Example:

> I have on my desk an Apacer RAM module with a label 512MB UNB PC3200 CL3,
> so it claims to be a PC-3200, Clock Latency=3.

> If the label was missing, I would take a look at the chips: 16 chips
> Infineon of the type HYB25D256800BT-5 (you may need a magnifying glass).
> I google for that, and the first match is

> http://www.intel.com/technology/memory/ddr/specs/DS_256M_D14_5_v0.9.pdf

> where I can find that those chips are of the type DDR400, 3-3-3, able to
> operate at 200MHz. Going to the Wikipedia

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDR_SDRAM

> (I am sure there are other references) I can see that the memory at
> 200MHz using DDR400 chips is called PC-3200. The label is then correct.

I am sorry. I don't understand your response. Which label is correct?
PC2-4200S-444 or PC2-3200S-288? /PaulN [sorry for the long quote]
Xavier Llobet - 22 May 2007 15:07 GMT
> In comp.sys.mac.system Xavier Llobet <Xavier.Lloobet@epfl.ch> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 51 lines]
> I am sorry. I don't understand your response. Which label is correct?
> PC2-4200S-444 or PC2-3200S-288? /PaulN [sorry for the long quote]

How could I know?

I did suggest you to look (physically, with a magnifying glass) at the
chips and identify them.

_x.

--
Only one "o" in my e-mail address
Paul Nevai - 22 May 2007 15:57 GMT
In comp.sys.mac.system Xavier Llobet <Xavier.Lloobet@epfl.ch> wrote:
> I did suggest you to look (physically, with a magnifying glass) at the
> chips and identify them.

Got it. I just did that. The label is 7ED22 D9GMH. Googling it gives 36
mostly Chinese web pages. I have no idea what they mean.  It looks like D9GMH
refers to overclocking. I still don't know if I have PC-4200 or PC-3200
DIMMs. Can you help? /PaulN
Xavier Llobet - 23 May 2007 09:20 GMT
> In comp.sys.mac.system Xavier Llobet <Xavier.Lloobet@epfl.ch> wrote:
> > I did suggest you to look (physically, with a magnifying glass) at the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> refers to overclocking. I still don't know if I have PC-4200 or PC-3200
> DIMMs. Can you help? /PaulN

If my googling is correct, the brand should be Kingbox, from Taiwan, and
the module should be red. Is that the case?

All the references I've seen to these modules describe them as DDR2-800,
which corresponds to PC2-6400, quite a fast beast, may I say.

If the brand is indeed Kingbox, you may try to e-mail them (a snapshot
could be helpful) at sales.tw@kingbox.com.tw

_x.

--
Only one "o" in my e-mail address
Paul Nevai - 23 May 2007 10:53 GMT
> > Got it. I just did that. The label is 7ED22 D9GMH. Googling it gives 36
> > mostly Chinese web pages. I have no idea what they mean.  It looks like D9GMH
> > refers to overclocking. I still don't know if I have PC-4200 or PC-3200
> > DIMMs. Can you help? /PaulN

> If my googling is correct, the brand should be Kingbox, from Taiwan, and
> the module should be red. Is that the case?

Nope, the module is standard black. The DIMM itself was "assembled" in Japan.
You are a great detective. Thanks, PaulN
Malcolm - 23 May 2007 14:55 GMT
> I need urgent advice...please...
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Thanks! /PaulN

Don't trust OSX's System Profiler's memory display.   It is often
wrong.   Try the System Profile option on the Apple Hardware Test that
came with the Mac.  It may be a partition on one of the install disks.  
Read the fine print on the discs.
Paul Nevai - 23 May 2007 17:11 GMT
In comp.sys.mac.system Malcolm <malcolm@invalid> wrote:
> Don't trust OSX's System Profiler's memory display.   It is often
> wrong.   Try the System Profile option on the Apple Hardware Test that
> came with the Mac.  It may be a partition on one of the install disks.  
> Read the fine print on the discs.

Wow!!! Great advice. Will try it later today. /PaulN
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.