> It is even worse for Intel Macs - the 10.4.9 combo update is 310 MB.
> > > thanks, the combo file is only 72 mb so whould be a problem as ive got
> > > bb.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> technology. You wouldn't need to install 3 different updates to
> QuickTime, say; just the last one.
There are three Java updates which must be installed sequentially (each
about 40 to 50 MB, with later ones not offered by Software Update until
the previous one has been installed). I'd also expect one update each
for QuickTime and iTunes, and at least one Security Update. That's 350
MB so far, not counting other ancillary technology or applications which
might need updates.
I haven't done a full install and update of 10.4 recently, but with 10.3
updating to 10.3.9 recently I recall seeing updates for iChat, Safari,
more than one Airport update, and several security updates (one big one
and a few small ones).
> > It is even worse for Intel Macs - the 10.4.9 combo update is 310 MB.
>
> The joy of universality.
Indeed. Everyone gets to enjoy big updates like this once Leopard is
released.

Signature
David Empson
dempson@actrix.gen.nz
Gregory Weston - 23 Apr 2007 16:51 GMT
> > > It is even worse for Intel Macs - the 10.4.9 combo update is 310 MB.
> >
> > The joy of universality.
>
> Indeed. Everyone gets to enjoy big updates like this once Leopard is
> released.
Presuming Apple doesn't strip the install on PPC machines. The reason
the x86 updates are big is to support apps running under Rosetta.
There's no rationale by which the x86 code needs to stick around on a
PPC box, though, except trivial time savings during the initial install.