My wireless router died this weekend and I need to replace it. This
being the second SMC I've had that didn't last or perform particularly
well (2 years and they seem to fry), I'm going for another brand. In
addition, I hope to find something with great wireless range.
I've narrowed the search down to the Belkin Pre-N and the Netgear
WPN824. I'll be using them on a mixed Mac/PC network (PowerBook G4,
Wintel notebook, iMac G5, and a hardwired dual G5).
I've read tons of reviews today, and am still on the fence. I'm seeing
reports that the Netgear drops connections and the Belkin is generally
great. Problem is, nobody posts which version of firmware they're using
(both have had firmware updates), and I've only seen one PB user for
each router.
Does anyone currently on this forum have an experience to share? My
router's death was yesterday and I need to have something working by
Monday. Both routers are in stock locally for fair prices, so I have
that bit of flexibility.
Thanks for any help,
Abbott
TKnTexas - 11 Jun 2006 10:23 GMT
I can't speak to the wireless routers of these two devices. However, I
have had Netgear firewall for over 3 years. A friend of mine has been
using a different model, but still a Netgear firewall. His has lasted
nearly 4 years. I like the Netgear equipment, they are made of metal,
not plastic. I purchased a Belkin wireless router. It was
light-weight and flimsy. It stopped working after six months. While
it worked, the range was very good.
Both my friend and I are using our Netgear boxes on mixed platform
networks. Work flawlessly. I have XP, Mac, and Linux on mine; there
are only XP and Mac on the other. Both of us have Apple wireless
devices to give wireless to our networks. Upgrading the firmware on
the Netgear was simple to do when the it was necessary.
> My wireless router died this weekend and I need to replace it. This
> being the second SMC I've had that didn't last or perform particularly
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Abbott Schindler - 11 Jun 2006 15:58 GMT
I had a feeling that Netgear was better than some of the other brands,
and I've read mixed things about Belkin (but almost all good about the
Pre-N). BTW: the Netgear box I'm looking at is plastic.
What I'm really trying to accomplish is, with my mostly 802.11g clients
(I'll have nothing newer for several years, I suspect):
- Get better reception throughout my house. My current SMC routers just
don't give reliable reception if I'm more than about 20 feet from them
with the PB G4).
- Get reliable reception within about 20-30 feet outside my house. Right
now, I can only count on the PB G4 if I sit right outside the room that
has the router. I know that some of this is the PB (my PC and Pismo
laptops fare far far better). But I need that PB to get reliable
reception outside.
I wonder if someone's got experience with MIMO routers and 802.11g
clients...If I got even 25-50% better reception within 10% more range
than I currently have, I'd be happy and feel the relatively small
incremental investment was worthwhile.
Abbott
> I can't speak to the wireless routers of these two devices. However, I
> have had Netgear firewall for over 3 years. A friend of mine has been
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> devices to give wireless to our networks. Upgrading the firmware on
> the Netgear was simple to do when the it was necessary.
Nick - 12 Jun 2006 06:41 GMT
In article
<abbottNOSPAM-569EB3.08583711062006@fcorpsurge2.newsfeeds.com>,
> I wonder if someone's got experience with MIMO routers and 802.11g
> clients...If I got even 25-50% better reception within 10% more range
> than I currently have, I'd be happy and feel the relatively small
> incremental investment was worthwhile.
I found that I got 50 to 100% more signal strength (range) than an
AirPort Extreme -- at various distances up to 75 feet with a Belkin
pre-n MIMO base station. And this was in a very very very RF noisy
environment, particularly in the 2.4 GHz band where there are 2 to 5
base stations on EVERY channel. The client wasn't even pre-n, just a G4
Powerbook on g.
Abbott Schindler - 12 Jun 2006 16:12 GMT
Thanks, Nick. I took the plunge yesterday and installed the Netgear
RangeMax and am finding about the same thing you did. Whereas my old SMC
router would be barely detectable outside the house, I can now get
usable signals at least 20 feet from the side of the house farthest from
where the RangeMax is installed...and I get at least 3 bars everywhere
in the house, even in places the old router only delivered 1-2 bars.
Like you, this is with my PowerBook's AirPort Extreme.
I put the Netgear in because it was on sale locally. Lacking substantial
input from the various places I posted, and having read about the same
fraction of good vs bad reports on the Belkin Pre-N and RangeMax
products, I went with Netgear. So far it looks very good; I'm looking
forward to seeing if this unit lasts better than the two SMCs I've
had...both of which went flakey or downright failed after 1.5-2 years.
> In article
> <abbottNOSPAM-569EB3.08583711062006@fcorpsurge2.newsfeeds.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> base stations on EVERY channel. The client wasn't even pre-n, just a G4
> Powerbook on g.
Bob Nielsen - 11 Jun 2006 16:44 GMT
> My wireless router died this weekend and I need to replace it. This
> being the second SMC I've had that didn't last or perform particularly
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Thanks for any help,
> Abbott
I am not familiar with those models but I tried a Belkin 802.11G router
and found it not suitable for my purposes (it did not allow me to do
forwarding of multiple ports), although it worked fine as a basic router.
I returned it and got a Netgear WGR614 and it has worked flawlessly for
the 8 months it has been in service. I am using it with a G4 Mini and two
i386 Linux boxes (one hard-wired). I didn't see any point in goi8ng to
pre-n or any other higher-speed hardware as my DSL connection is the
limiting factor.