Hi, I run Photoshop CS for photography work, which is fine most of the time.
But when I work on larger files, 50mb and above, things tend to slow down a
bit when it's processing filters, etc. The budget has to be small as I only
want another year or two from this machine before the Mactels settle down
and Adobe has brought out CS3.
G4 Powermac 'Gigabit Ethernet' running OSX 10.4.6.
Dual 500 processors
1.5 gig ram
40 gig hard drive
Rage 128 Pro
Lacie 120 gig ext firewire hard drive - partitioned for storage and scratch
disc.
I may as well upgrade the original 40gb hard drive as it's 6 years old, but
perhaps I could also add a pair of drives set up as raid in 'Disk Utility'
to hold Photoshop and some scratch space, or would Photoshop be better on
the main drive but still have scratch space on a raid? Any problems with
this? Am I thinking too much? But more importantly, would I notice a
significant difference in performance - half the processing time?
Any comments most welcome. Thanks.
John Snow - 09 Jun 2006 17:24 GMT
I have a Gigabit, came single processor.
OWC has a Serial ATA card for $49, takes 4 drives. It also does away
with the size limit. Mine set up seamlessly, and I found a 200 GB drive
for $60 at Outpost. Eventually I'll get one or two more for a raid.
It's a nice, FAST upgrade.
Downside is it only works in OS X. So I have a 40 gb drive set up just
for 9.2.2, with all classic apps on it, in case I need to BOOT into
9.2.2. Haven't needed it yet--might never.
Then I found a 1 ghz. upgrade (I got it used). OWC seems to have some
good values. Look carefully at upgrades, as some have NO L3 cache!
Mine has 2 mb L3 and 512 k L2.
If you're really adventurous, I found an AGP Radeon 9200 for PC.
Strangedogs.com has all you need to flash it to MAC. Works great.
Good luck.
> Hi, I run Photoshop CS for photography work, which is fine most of the time.
> But when I work on larger files, 50mb and above, things tend to slow down a
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Any comments most welcome. Thanks.