>> The iMic has a switch that switches the input from line-level to
>> mic-level. Mic-level enables a pre-amp that has enough gain for a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> ok so youre saying that a hardware eq is probably generally better than
> a software one?
There is a theoretical advantage to the hardware equalization. With
the software equalization, the computer has to multiply the lower
frequency signals by up to 100 times. This means any distortion
caused by step-size non-uniformities in the A to D converter get
emphasized. Another consideration is the input impedance of the
pre-amp. Phono cartridges are designed to give the correct frequency
response when connected to a standard impedance (47 KOhms for a moving
magnet cartridge) pre-amp input. I have not been able to find the
specs for the iMic input impedance. If you have a moving coil phono
cartridge you definitely want to use a pre-amp designed for that type
of cartridge.
I have read some people are satisfied with the software equalization, some not.
David C. - 14 May 2006 17:36 GMT
> There is a theoretical advantage to the hardware equalization. With
> the software equalization, the computer has to multiply the lower
> frequency signals by up to 100 times. This means any distortion
> caused by step-size non-uniformities in the A to D converter get
> emphasized.
It should be noted that these errors can be minimized by using higher
bit-depths and sampling rates.
For example, if you digitize at 24-bit/96KHz, perform all your edits on
that, and then downsample it to 16-bit/44KHz, you'll get much better
quality than digitizing at 16/44 and editing that.
I don't know what the iMic is capable of, however, so the above
paragraph may be moot.
-- David