Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Applications / Excel / July 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Scope of range names different in 2008?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
sflaherty@officeformac.com - 18 Jul 2008 17:30 GMT
Version: 2008
Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard)
Processor: Intel

I have a workbook made of sheets with the same format, but drawing from different data. So I have a template sheet that I duplicate and point to new data. Many of the formulas rely on named ranges. In 2004 I could duplicate the template sheet within the workbook and the duplicate sheet would have the same named ranges.

In 2008, however, some of the names are missing on the duplicated sheet. Has something changed about the scope of names so that they're more global? Is there such a thing as a "local" name (unique within a sheet) and a "global" name (unique within a workbook)?

Thanks,
Sean
Bob Greenblatt - 18 Jul 2008 18:02 GMT
On 7/18/08 12:30 PM, in article 59b548b7.-1@webcrossing.caR9absDaxw,

> Version: 2008
> Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard)
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Thanks,
> Sean
Sort of, but not quite. There certainly are names that local to a sheet.
These names are preceded with the sheet name and look like: sheet1!Aname. In
the define names dialog, they will have the sheet name to the right in the
dialog. Global names, available to all sheets in the workbook do not have
the sheet name on the right side of the dialog box. However, to my
knowledge, nothing changed here with Excel 2008. It has always worked this
way.

However, some names that may have been OK in earlier versions of Excel, like
AXY23 may now be invalid as they are ambiguous in the large grid.

Signature

Bob Greenblatt [MVP], Macintosh
bobgreenblattATmsnDOTcom

sflaherty@officeformac.com - 18 Jul 2008 19:50 GMT
Bob,

Thanks for the guick response. I never noticed this difference and now I was able to fix the spreadsheet to work the same. By making all the names local, the system use is successful.

Just to note, something has definitely changed in this area because the operation between 2004 and 2008 is different...but I'm not sure I'll take the time to narrow it down further. After several months and a pro support incident, my last VBA has been converted to AppleScript. Now I can get back to work!

Regards,
Sean
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.