[...]
> Hey, I'm already old. If that's what's going on I'm not knocking it.
> At first glance, it's just puzzling such a feature exists only in the
> Mac version. Spell checking is also turned on in Windows but Eudora
> doesn't underline in the same fashion or turn "misspelled" words into
> different colors.
I don't use the spell checker (I prefer to make my own mistakes), but
AFAIK it marks what it considers misspelled by underlining it with a red
squiglly line. (Much like any text app in Mac OS X, if it uses the
built-in spellcheker, I think.)
If you see the colour of characters themselves change, something else is
happening. Since you mentioned hyperlinks: Eudora, like many apps, tries
to recognize strings that are URLs and turns them into hyperlinks. This
is presentational feature only of course, the text itself is not
changed. Eudora shows such URLs in blue and underlined.
The reason it may seem to happen 'only sometimes' is that Eudora does it
only with valid URLs. For example, www.apple.com is not a URL, as it
lacks the protocol spcifier. http://www.apple.com is a valid URL (well,
at least valid enogh to Eudora).
If you're going to type URLs, you might as well know that it's wise to
enclose them in angle brackets: <http://www.apple.com>. Not only because
that's officially requiered, and because a lot of software sill ensure
that long URLs (too long to fit a single line) will still be recognized
as URLs and thus truned into 'hot links', but simply because suchg a
delimiter makes it easier for humans to recognise beginning and end of
the URL.
If you want to be pedantic, you write them truly valid:
<URL:http://www.apple.com> ;)

Signature
Sander Tekelenburg, <http://www.euronet.nl/~tekelenb/>
Mac user: "Macs only have 40 viruses, tops!"
PC user: "SEE! Not even the virus writers support Macs!"
Peter Ceresole - 26 Jul 2004 10:06 GMT
> If you want to be pedantic, you write them truly valid:
> <URL:http://www.apple.com> ;)
This, however, breaks the link recognition some in applications (Safari?
Or maybe Mozilla). Better without the 'URL'.

Signature
Peter
Sander Tekelenburg - 30 Jul 2004 21:51 GMT
> > If you want to be pedantic, you write them truly valid:
> > <URL:http://www.apple.com> ;)
>
> This, however, breaks the link recognition some in applications (Safari?
> Or maybe Mozilla). Better without the 'URL'.
So much for being pedantic ;)

Signature
Sander Tekelenburg, <http://www.euronet.nl/~tekelenb/>
Mac user: "Macs only have 40 viruses, tops!"
PC user: "SEE! Not even the virus writers support Macs!"
Alice Faber - 26 Jul 2004 15:47 GMT
> [...]
>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> If you want to be pedantic, you write them truly valid:
> <URL:http://www.apple.com> ;)
Another possibility is mood-watch. When you're composing, it highlights
items that it thinks might be offensive; sometimes, the program's idea
of what might be offensive is a little off kilter.

Signature
AF
Paolo Cordone - 27 Jul 2004 14:05 GMT
> Another possibility is mood-watch. When you're composing, it highlights
> items that it thinks might be offensive
I hate to do this, but I will have to be pedantic again. MoodWatch does not
underlines questionable words, but draws them in red.
Paolo
JPaul - 28 Jul 2004 12:10 GMT
> I hate to do this, but I will have to be pedantic again. MoodWatch does not
> underlines questionable words, but draws them in red.
In his first post PL said :
> Anyone know why certain words become underlined, change color and appear
> as if they are hyperlinks as I type emails?
Thus I think IMHO that Moodwatch answers to the question of "changing
color".
JPaul.

Signature
/==/==\\-\ Jean-Paul BLANC
/ /--/--//\\ quelque-part (somewhere)
|/| L |\\\ en (in)
\/|| = |||\\\ FRANCE
Paolo Cordone - 27 Jul 2004 14:04 GMT
> AFAIK it marks what it considers misspelled by underlining it with a red
> squiglly line.
Sorry for being pedantic, but the line is not squiggly, as in Word. Only a
nice straight underline.
:-)
Paolo