Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Applications / Eudora / April 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Can Junk mail be filtered from body of messages?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
David Stembridge - 22 Apr 2004 14:18 GMT
Seems as though the settings only allow for subject, and sender
info... which are easily forged.

Thanks!
Kathy Morgan - 24 Apr 2004 08:33 GMT
> Seems as though the settings only allow for subject, and sender
> info... which are easily forged.

What software are you using?  Eudora allows filtering on any of the
headers or body, and if you're using the recent versions, the Junk mail
filtering is bayesian.  

Signature

Kathy

Luc - 24 Apr 2004 12:33 GMT
> > Seems as though the settings only allow for subject, and sender
> > info... which are easily forged.
>
> What software are you using?  Eudora allows filtering on any of the
> headers or body, and if you're using the recent versions, the Junk mail
> filtering is bayesian.  

Hello,

Not exactly "any" you canot for example filter on the attachment

Luc
Mike Rosenberg - 24 Apr 2004 13:36 GMT
> > What software are you using?  Eudora allows filtering on any of the
> > headers or body...  
>
> Not exactly "any" you canot for example filter on the attachment

An attachment isn't any of the headers or body.

Signature

Mike Rosenberg
<http://www.macconsult.com> Macintosh consulting services for NE
<http://bogart-tribute.net> Tribute to Humphrey Bogart
Ralph Nader: Unsafe at any speed

Luc - 24 Apr 2004 15:01 GMT
> > > What software are you using?  Eudora allows filtering on any of the
> > > headers or body...  
> >
> > Not exactly "any" you canot for example filter on the attachment
>
> An attachment isn't any of the headers or body.

Mike,

I'm not by far a RFC or Mail, or MIME or anything this kind specialist,
byt it seems Content-type is part of the headers :

http://www.dsv.su.se/~jpalme/ietf/ietf-mail-attributes.html

Luc
Bill Cole - 24 Apr 2004 17:49 GMT
In article
<1gcr8g0.eezt6011bkxb8N%luc_ENLEVER@saint-elie_CEMACHIN_.com>,

> > > > What software are you using?  Eudora allows filtering on any of the
> > > > headers or body...  
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> http://www.dsv.su.se/~jpalme/ietf/ietf-mail-attributes.html

Correct, and if I am interpreting the contents of the UserJunkDB.txt
file, Eudora's filters are indeed using all of the MIME headers to feed
the filters. This is supported by the fact that Eudora has been doing a
pretty good job in my mail of catching worm mail as Junk, even those
varieties with little or no content other than an attached payload.

Signature

Now where did I hide that website...

Mike Rosenberg - 25 Apr 2004 14:58 GMT
> I'm not by far a RFC or Mail, or MIME or anything this kind specialist,
> byt it seems Content-type is part of the headers :

I'm embarrassed by my previous post.  Of course you're right.  Sorry for
my mistake!

Signature

Mike Rosenberg
<http://www.macconsult.com> Macintosh consulting services for NE
<http://bogart-tribute.net> Tribute to Humphrey Bogart
Ralph Nader: Unsafe at any speed

Kathy Morgan - 24 Apr 2004 21:54 GMT
> > > What software are you using?  Eudora allows filtering on any of the
> > > headers or body...  
> >
> > Not exactly "any" you canot for example filter on the attachment
>
> An attachment isn't any of the headers or body.

I do filter on attachments, although indirectly--use as criteria that
the body contains ".pif" or ".scr" or ".exe" and that will catch most of
the garbage with attachments.

Signature

Kathy

Peter Ceresole - 24 Apr 2004 12:59 GMT
>What software are you using?  Eudora allows filtering on any of the
>headers or body, and if you're using the recent versions, the Junk mail
>filtering is bayesian.  

Is there any way of filtering on Bcc?

That'd be nice.

Signature

Peter

Bill Cole - 24 Apr 2004 17:39 GMT
> >What software are you using?  Eudora allows filtering on any of the
> >headers or body, and if you're using the recent versions, the Junk mail
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> That'd be nice.

In theory no mail should ever arrive with a Bcc header present. You
COULD filter based on the existence of any Bcc header and catch no mail
that was handled by correctly-operating mail software.

The 'Bcc' mechanism, when working properly, is handled entirely at the
submission phase when the originating 'mail user agent' (for example,
Eudora or Outlook)  takes what the user has authored and puts it on the
wire for the first time. The addresses in the Bcc header get stripped
out of the message by the MUA and put in the SMTP envelope instead. By
the time the message is actually transmitted, there is no Bcc header at
all.

The fact that headers do not control delivery is also noticeable in
messages sent to legitimate mailing lists. The output of most such lists
hit SMTP with a To header of the list submission address and a pile of
addresses in  the SMTP envelope, which is what determines where the
message is delivered. The elements in the SMTP envelope are only present
as part of the transport layer and are only seen by the SMTP servers
handling delivery to those specific addresses.

Generally you can detect messages not sent specifically to you by
filtering on the presence of your email address in recipient headers.  
Having used Eudora continuously for the entire time that it has
supported filtering, I have an absurd number of order-sensitive filters,
and one of the last ones, after all the filters that move messages to
special mailboxes dedicated to various lists I am subscribed to, is one
that filters mail where <Any Recipient> does not contain "scconsult.com"
and <Any Recipient> does not contain [another domain I receive mail in]
into a mailbox called 'likely garbage'. By the time mail gets to that
filter, all the mail to mailing lists I've subscribed to  has already
been diverted to various mailboxes, and what's left which is not
addressed specifically to one of my addresses is either spam or
something that someone has consciously Bcc'd to me.

Signature

Now where did I hide that website...

Peter Ceresole - 24 Apr 2004 18:30 GMT
>In theory no mail should ever arrive with a Bcc header present. You
>COULD filter based on the existence of any Bcc header and catch no mail
>that was handled by correctly-operating mail software.

Thanks for the explanation. I always thought that you couldn't filter
directly on Bcc and now I know that was right- and why.

Fortunately for me it's a small problem, not many hurt...

Signature

Peter

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.