Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Applications / Eudora / January 2010



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Eudora and IPv6

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
R. Millstein - 12 Jan 2010 21:56 GMT
Hi all,

Not to sound alarmist, but will the eventual switch to IPv6 be the thing
that forces us all to give up on Eudora as we know it?  For those not
familiar with IPv6, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6 -- I can't say
that I myself know much about it, thus my question.

Roberta
Signature

Roberta Millstein
usenet@spamaway.rlm.net
Remove "spamaway" to reply

Jim Gibson - 12 Jan 2010 22:58 GMT
> Hi all,
>
> Not to sound alarmist, but will the eventual switch to IPv6 be the thing
> that forces us all to give up on Eudora as we know it?  For those not
> familiar with IPv6, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6 -- I can't say
> that I myself know much about it, thus my question.

It will take many years (or decades) for IP6 to supplant IP4. There are
billions of people currently using IP4, and few will switch over
willingly, but will switch whenever their operating system forces them
to do so.

From the Wikipedia article to which you linked:

"Most transport- and application-layer protocols need little or no
change to operate over IPv6; exceptions are application protocols that
embed network-layer addresses, such as FTP or NTPv3."

If we are lucky, POP3 and SMTP are not among the protocols using
network-layer addresses, and Mac OS X.? will seamlessly allow Eudora to
talk to mail server using IP4 and IP6 transparently.

My guess is that Eudora will last until Apple drops support for Rosetta
in 3-5 years.

Signature

Jim Gibson

Kathy Morgan - 13 Jan 2010 01:48 GMT
> > Hi all,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> willingly, but will switch whenever their operating system forces them
> to do so. [...]

I believe IP4 is a subset of IP6, so we should be okay until the mail
server(s) we connect to switches to IP6.

Signature

Kathy

Julian Y. Koh - 14 Jan 2010 19:50 GMT
> I believe IP4 is a subset of IP6, so we should be okay until the mail
> server(s) we connect to switches to IP6.

Not exactly.  It is possible to run in what is called dual-stack mode,
where a machine speaks both IPv6 and IPv4 (indeed, that's the default mode
of OS X since at least 10.4), but the two protocols are completely separate
and independent of each other.  One isn't a subset of the other or vice
versa.

Signature

Julian Y. Koh
kohster@gmail.com
PGP Public Key: <http://bt.ittns.northwestern.edu/julian/pgppubkey.html>

David Morrison - 14 Jan 2010 02:40 GMT
> My guess is that Eudora will last until Apple drops support for Rosetta
> in 3-5 years.

You probably will not see IPv6 in widespread use before that anyway.
Internet backbones may be using it, but most sites will continue to use
IPv4 internally until they are forced to change. Most of the routers out
there at the moment either have no or untested IPv6 support, so
upgrading will be a major project.

David
John H Meyers - 15 Jan 2010 02:31 GMT
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:40:34 -0600:

Jim Gibson
>> My guess is that Eudora will last until Apple drops support for Rosetta
>> in 3-5 years.

David Morrison
> You probably will not see IPv6 in widespread use before that anyway.
> Internet backbones may be using it, but most sites will continue to use
> IPv4 internally until they are forced to change. Most of the routers
> out there at the moment either have no or untested IPv6 support,
> so upgrading will be a major project.

"Necessity is the mother of invention"

And the necessity may be:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv4_address_exhaustion

However, is any IP addressing dependency built into Eudora?

--
John H Meyers - 15 Jan 2010 03:09 GMT
More details re IPv4 address exhaustion:

"2010 could be the last year for IPv4 as we know it"
http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/09/2010-could-be-the-last-year-for-ipv4-as-
we-know-it.ars


--
David Empson - 15 Jan 2010 03:51 GMT
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:40:34 -0600:
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> However, is any IP addressing dependency built into Eudora?

Yes.

The issue of IPv6 compatibility will come up everywhere that Eudora
currently deals with a configuration parameter which might be either a
domain name or IP address.

In short, the main issues are:

- Domain name lookup is assuming IPv4 and won't try to ask for an IPv6
address (which has a different record type). Eudora therefore can't
connect to an IPv6-only server by domain name, because it won't find its
address.

- Eudora's address parsing code won't recognise an IPv6 address if you
entered one manually into Eudora's configuration (instead of using a
domain name). Eudora also wouldn't be able to parse the result of
getting an IPv6 address from DNS, if it was able to ask for it.

- The data structure used to hold a parsed IP address needs to be big
enough to hold an IPv6 address. This isn't likely unless the application
was written with IPv6 in mind.

There are bound to be other issues.
Signature

David Empson
dempson@actrix.gen.nz

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.