Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Applications / Eudora / December 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Addressee changed to "unsubscribe"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Norm - 07 Dec 2007 15:00 GMT
Just a beginner curiosity question.

I was typing an email in Eudora and must have hit a wrong key(s)
possibly including open-Apple.

At that point, the To field changed from what I had entered to something
like "unsubscribe@......." (with the name of some company after the @
sign).

Curious why that would happen and if I need to look for any problems,
virus, spam, etc.

Thanks for any tips.
Steve W. Jackson - 07 Dec 2007 15:49 GMT
> Just a beginner curiosity question.
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Thanks for any tips.

There are *no* viruses on Mac OS X -- none.  So that can't be the cause.  
And spam can't possibly cause your mail composition to do anything hokey
like that.

Eudora supports its own address books (multiples) and reads from the one
in Mac OS X.  Depending on settings and possible keystrokes, it's
entirely possible that you simply somehow recalled an earlier address or
nickname or such.  Since you indicate that you probably hit one or more
wrong keys, it's probably a simple matter of user error and no more.
Signature

Steve W. Jackson
Montgomery, Alabama

John H Meyers - 08 Dec 2007 00:19 GMT
> There are *no* viruses on Mac OS X -- none.

"OSX/Leap-A worm spreads via iChat instant messaging software" [Feb 2006]
http://www.sophos.com/pressoffice/news/articles/2006/02/macosxleap.html
http://www.symantec.com/security_response/writeup.jsp?docid=2006-021614-4006-99

http://www.securemac.com/ [Follow all the links]

http://www.ambrosiasw.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=102379

Signature

"There are no viruses on Macs"

"See? -- even the virus writers don't support Macs!"

Steve W. Jackson - 10 Dec 2007 17:01 GMT
> > There are *no* viruses on Mac OS X -- none.
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> http://www.ambrosiasw.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=102379

This proves that Sophos thinks worms are a sub-category of viruses, a
claim with which I strongly disagree.  I still believe that my original
statement that there are *no* viruses in existence for OS X is correct.  
All this does is take advantage of people's inattention.
Signature

Steve W. Jackson
Montgomery, Alabama

Peter Ceresole - 10 Dec 2007 18:29 GMT
> This proves that Sophos thinks worms are a sub-category of viruses, a
> claim with which I strongly disagree.

It reminds me a little of the bad joke about the Irish virus, all those
years ago:

"Hello. This is an Irish virus.

Please delete all the files on your hard disk.

Thank you."
Signature

Peter

John H Meyers - 10 Dec 2007 22:44 GMT
>> "OSX/Leap-A worm spreads via iChat instant messaging software" [Feb 2006]
>> http://www.sophos.com/pressoffice/news/articles/2006/02/macosxleap.html
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>>
>> http://www.ambrosiasw.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=102379

> This proves that Sophos...

And Symantec?

> thinks worms are a sub-category of viruses,
> a claim with which I strongly disagree.
> I still believe that my original statement that there are *no* viruses
> in existence for OS X is correct.
> All this does is take advantage of people's inattention.

Well, you should blame the liberal interpretation on me,
rather than on any AV companies, which probably have
used the term more strictly than have I.

When I see an OP ask whether some glitch might be due
to a virus, I take "virus" to mean "any malware";
otherwise it's like the cop squad which lets a thief
escape a mall, even though ordered to "cover all the exits,"
because of nit-picking over a technicality,
in which the thief actually escaped via an "Entrance" :)
Steve W. Jackson - 11 Dec 2007 17:49 GMT
[ snip ]

> When I see an OP ask whether some glitch might be due
> to a virus, I take "virus" to mean "any malware";
> otherwise it's like the cop squad which lets a thief
> escape a mall, even though ordered to "cover all the exits,"
> because of nit-picking over a technicality,
> in which the thief actually escaped via an "Entrance" :)

I'm not going to disagree with this.  But it's annoying that so many
people encounter some strange behavior and the very first question they
ask is "do I have a virus?" when (at least to me) it is *so* inane to
even think that.  Maybe it's just me...
Signature

Steve W. Jackson
Montgomery, Alabama

John H Meyers - 12 Dec 2007 18:16 GMT
> it's annoying that so many people encounter some strange behavior
> and the very first question they ask is "do I have a virus?"
> when (at least to me) it is *so* inane to even think that.

Yes, a bit like wondering whether any cough
might indicate having caught a plague;
it could be, but other things are more likely,
and might be checked out first,
particularly if one has all along
been taking good care of general health
with attention to preventive measures and cautions.

"See the attachment for further details" :)

--
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.