New arrival: Odysseus
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Martin S. - 05 Sep 2007 18:38 GMT <http://www.infinitydatasystems.com/products/odysseus/>
"Needless to say, we were saddened by Qualcomm's abandonment of Eudora. And while we have the utmost respect for the Thunderbird/Eudora team, like many Eudora users, we don't believe that modifying Thunderbird to mimic Eudora offers Eudora users the features, functionality, or experience they've come to love and depend on. Its our belief that only an application written from the ground up can adequately succeed a program as great as Eudora."
Sounds promising :-)
 Signature Cheers Martin
Matt Simpson - 06 Sep 2007 14:28 GMT > Sounds promising I think calling it an "arrival" is overly optimistic. Having been vastly disappointed by Penelope, I would certainly be happy to see a better alternative, and I hope "Infinity Data Systems" succeeds with the development of Odysseus. But I certainly wouldn't bet on it.
Their website gives a distinct feeling that there's not much behind it. And I don't think they have a solid business plan trying to develop a new email client from the ground up at a time when there's a solid trend away from desktop email clients towards web-based systems like Gmail. Personally, I hate browser-based email, so I'm not saying the trend is a good one, but it's where the market is going.
If there was any chance of profitability, Qualcomm would have figured out a way to spin off the Eudora business and keep it going.
Bill Cole - 06 Sep 2007 15:14 GMT > <http://www.infinitydatasystems.com/products/odysseus/> > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Sounds promising :-) Not really.
Anyone can write a paragraph on a web page, and that's all Odysseus is at this point. Penelope is at least a real (albeit broken) piece of software.
I find it amusing that they call out HTML rendering as something that needs fixing. I would put that at the very bottom of my list of problems in Eudora for the modern net. Making a MUA do complex rendering on mail is a very bad thing, and modifying Eudora's current approach wouldn't even be on my list of things that need repair and/or updating in Mac Eudora.
 Signature Now where did I hide that website...
Paolo Cordone - 06 Sep 2007 18:29 GMT > Sounds promising :-) It does to me too, despite what others have said in here. I don't know why the pessimism...
Let's hope they can indeed create a better alternative to Penelope.
Paolo
John H Meyers - 06 Sep 2007 21:09 GMT Funded by what?
--
Paolo Cordone - 06 Sep 2007 23:16 GMT > Funded by what? Eh? Talking to me?
Paolo
John H Meyers - 06 Sep 2007 23:20 GMT Talking to no particular person.
Just wondering what will fund a ground-up development of a new email client which intends to go further than Eudora (Qualcomm is "funding" Penelope/"Eudora 8" via paying its developers).
--
Paolo Cordone - 06 Sep 2007 23:19 GMT > Funded by what? Why are you asking me? I don't work for them.
Paolo
Brana Bujenovic - 07 Sep 2007 13:07 GMT "Martin S." <nosp@m.net> wrote in news:nosp- 719CF0.17384305092007@news.simnet.is:
> <http://www.infinitydatasystems.com/products/odysseus/> > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Sounds promising :-) Odysseus was Penelope's husband, according to Homer at least :-) She waited for his arrival for many many long years...
It does, I do hope they'll put up first the beta by Christmas.
>From: Matt Simpson <net-news69@jmatt.net> >Newsgroups: comp.mail.eudora.mac > >If there was any chance of profitability, Qualcomm would have figured >out a way to spin off the Eudora business and keep it going. I think such a project can indeed be profitable, but not for the large corporations, rather for a smaller entrepreneurial teams, small companies. In those corporations you have to support layers, marketing people, CEO's, accountants and so forth; that all ads up to the product price so developers receive very small percent of it. (The irony is, most of them think in terms of a paycheck, and are really grateful for the cubical...)
 Signature =============================== E-Gadgets Home Page ------------------------------- http://e-gadgets.freehostia.com ===============================
Kathy Morgan - 08 Sep 2007 06:10 GMT > "Martin S." <nosp@m.net> wrote in news:nosp- > 719CF0.17384305092007@news.simnet.is: [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > Odysseus was Penelope's husband, according to Homer at least :-) > She waited for his arrival for many many long years... I also think it sounds promising...but I hope we don't have to wait as long to find out as Penelope waited.
> >From: Matt Simpson <net-news69@jmatt.net> > >Newsgroups: comp.mail.eudora.mac [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > corporations, rather for a smaller entrepreneurial teams, small companies. > In those corporations you have to support layers, marketing people, CEO's, I had the impression from the website that it may be a very small new team. If so, they'd be able to make a profit more easily than a corporation even with a small price. I like their Web site, and it makes iCab smile. That's unusual these days.
 Signature Kathy - If you're reading this in your web browser from Google or similar forum, NNTP "newsreaders" are a better way to access the content. <http://www.aptalaska.net/~kmorgan/how-it-works.html> Links to NNTP newsreaders at <http://www.newsreaders.com/>
Brana Bujenovic - 08 Sep 2007 13:47 GMT >> "Martin S." <nosp@m.net> wrote in news:nosp- >> 719CF0.17384305092007@news.simnet.is: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > I also think it sounds promising...but I hope we don't have to wait as > long to find out as Penelope waited. Yeah.. Besides us waiting, development changes fast. I would say one year in software development (as a percent of a product lifetime) is somewhere around 10 human years, on average. Something like that, maybe less, anyhow the sooner someone starts it, the better.
>> >If there was any chance of profitability, Qualcomm would have >> >figured out a way to spin off the Eudora business and keep it going. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > corporation even with a small price. I like their Web site, and it > makes iCab smile. That's unusual these days. If that is the case, I am sure they can profit, and that with the reasonable price of, say 25-30 bucks for product. No ads window. That "if" remains, but I guess we'll see soon.
 Signature =============================== E-Gadgets Home Page ------------------------------- http://e-gadgets.freehostia.com ===============================
hilbert@siliconharbour.com - 27 Sep 2007 16:39 GMT > I think such a project can indeed be profitable, but not for the large > corporations, rather for a smaller entrepreneurial teams, small companies. > In those corporations you have to support layers, marketing people, CEO's, > accountants and so forth; that all ads up to the product price so > developers receive very small percent of it. (The irony is, most of them > think in terms of a paycheck, and are really grateful for the cubical...) Absolutely correct. Remember, Microsoft made Outlook 'free' so what Brana says makes sense. (As M$ effectively nuked all big-boy competition right out of the equation (as it was uneconomic to compete with a 'free' Outlook Express).
In recent years, Qualcomm's poor handling and pathetically inadequate development of Eudora can only be described as laughable by Eudora's opposition and as a disgrace by Eudora's long-suffering users. .
Matt Milano - 09 Sep 2007 06:04 GMT > <http://www.infinitydatasystems.com/products/odysseus/> > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Sounds promising :-) Hi Everyone,
I thought I'd try to answer a couple of questions regarding Odysseus.
1. The Odysseus project is being funded internally by our company. Having been in the custom software development market for nearly a decade, we believe we have the experience and resources to properly develop this application.
Unfortunately, most of our work having been done in the custom software market, we can't wave a list of the companies we've worked for due to NDAs. However, suffice it to say that we have worked for all types of companies, ranging from startups to Fortune 500 companies and major universities.
2. Although there has been a major shift toward web-based email, and web-based services in general, there's still a significant portion of the market that relies on email applications for their business. One day that may change... but we're not betting on it. And even if we're wrong, that day is still a ways down the road.
3. One thing Qualcomm made very clear when they announced the decision to discontinue Eudora was that it had nothing to do with profitability. They said that Eudora was a profitable division.... just not one that fit in with the rest of their business.... something everyone else has realized for years. :-)
4. The reason we used HTML as one example of something that we would like to improve has nothing to do with how high or low we rate that feature. Its simply one feature that we've commonly heard as a complaint, and a reason many Apple Mail users list for their switch to Mail from Eudora. Personally, there's a number of other limitations that I find much more annoying than the HTML rendering.
We are encouraging individuals to visit our forums to make recommendations/requests for features they'd like to see improved and/or added.
I hope this answers a few questions. If anyone has anymore, I'll be happy to answer them to the best of my ability. In the meantime, we'll be posting information on our forums, as well as to our mailing list as we achieve significant milestones.
 Signature Matt Milano Project Manager Infinity Data Systems, LLC www.infinitydatasystems.com
Kathy Morgan - 09 Sep 2007 09:13 GMT > I thought I'd try to answer a couple of questions regarding Odysseus. > > 1. The Odysseus project is being funded internally by our company. > Having been in the custom software development market for nearly a > decade, we believe we have the experience and resources to properly > develop this application. Thanks for speaking up. Obviously my speculation that you were a new company was wrong. :-)
I'm looking forward to trying out Odysseus, and I've signed up for your mailing list.
 Signature Kathy - If you're reading this in your web browser from Google or similar forum, NNTP "newsreaders" are a better way to access the content. <http://www.aptalaska.net/~kmorgan/how-it-works.html> Links to NNTP newsreaders at <http://www.newsreaders.com/>
R. Millstein - 09 Sep 2007 21:56 GMT > I thought I'd try to answer a couple of questions regarding Odysseus. [very helpful responses deleted]
> I hope this answers a few questions. If anyone has anymore, I'll be > happy to answer them to the best of my ability. In the meantime, we'll > be posting information on our forums, as well as to our mailing list as > we achieve significant milestones. Thanks, Matt -- I very much appreciate you taking the time to respond to questions that were raised here. Speaking for myself, I am hopeful that there will be some sort of successor to Eudora, wherever it comes from. I'm keeping an eye on Penelope, but now I'll also keep an eye on Odysseus.
Two sets of questions come to mind at the moment:
1. I see you are planning on Windows and Mac development both. Will it be the same app, or will there be some differences? Will one be prioritized over the other? (i.e., will the Windows release come before the Mac release, or vice versa? or will the releases be at the same time?). We in the Mac world have been the "second sister" many times before, with later releases lacking full features. Personally, I try to patronize companies that prioritize Macs.
2. And somewhat relatedly -- do you have any plans for Mac integration, e.g., with the Address Book and Calendar?
Thanks again,
Roberta
 Signature Roberta Millstein usenet@spamaway.rlm.net Remove "spamaway" to reply
-- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Matt Milano - 09 Sep 2007 23:41 GMT > > I thought I'd try to answer a couple of questions regarding Odysseus. > [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > > Roberta Roberta,
Those are good questions.
1. The application will be a true cross-platform app. It will not be two separate sets of code for each platform. One code base... one app... one feature set. Our development team is a mixed team in terms of OS choice as a matter of necessity. I personally, as well as my Lead Developer, are Mac guys to the core and have been since the Classic days. So you can rest assured that the Mac will not be a "second sister" in terms of the Odysseus project.
2. Odysseus will absolutely integrate with Address Books, and eventually iCal. That's one of the areas where we always felt Eudora could have, and should have, been improved. Since Qualcomm never did, and its unlikely that Thunderbird/Eudora 8 will either.... we will.
Sincerely,
 Signature Matt Milano Project Manager Infinity Data Systems, LLC www.infinitydatasystems.com
Bill Cole - 10 Sep 2007 00:41 GMT > 2. Odysseus will absolutely integrate with Address Books, and eventually > iCal. That's one of the areas where we always felt Eudora could have, > and should have, been improved. Since Qualcomm never did, and its > unlikely that Thunderbird/Eudora 8 will either.... we will. FWIW, there are MacOS X integration bugs in the TBird bugzilla, and it looks like Steve Dorner and Matt Dudziak take the issue seriously. It actually seems quite likely to anyone actually paying attention that Address Book and iCal integration will be coming in Penelope and in TBird as a whole.
For AB integration, the upstream TBird bug-fix patch has *finally* been committed to the (3.0) trunk and there are 2.x builds with the same basic patch: it just takes some integration work to make Penelope woth with AB.
For iCal integration, there's actually a complex cascade of issues, but they look like they are coming along in TB3. Aside from the politics of whether to let TB live in the real world and integrate with iCal or live in Fantasy MozillaWorld where Sunbird integration serves that task, the key issue to make any mail program as good as Mail.app in working with iCal is robust AppleScript support. There is still a hairy issue of modifying iCal (really) in a way that Apple could regress without warning, but any mailer with AppleScript support as good as Eudora 6 can be made into iCal's partner.
 Signature Now where did I hide that website...
Sandy Foster - 10 Sep 2007 01:17 GMT > 1. The application will be a true cross-platform app. It will not be two > separate sets of code for each platform. One code base... one app... one [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > and should have, been improved. Since Qualcomm never did, and its > unlikely that Thunderbird/Eudora 8 will either.... we will. It's very good to hear that there are Mac people involved in this! I also am too used to the fact that Mac versions of software, if they appear at all, often appear much later than the Windows versions, frequently with a restricted feature set, and often with a Windows look to them.
My question may sound a bit dumb, but I've never had much exposure to people on a development team before. How do you know when to estimate that you'll have the beta and final versions ready?
 Signature Sandy sw.foster 1 (at) gmail (dot) com (remove/change the obvious) http://www.sandymike.net
Bill Cole - 10 Sep 2007 02:44 GMT > My question may sound a bit dumb, but I've never had much exposure to > people on a development team before. How do you know when to estimate > that you'll have the beta and final versions ready? NOT a dumb question, and one that you are unlikely to get a straight answer to from anyone currently offering a specific timeline for a specific piece of software.
The truth is that it's guesswork and hunches fed by experience. There have been attempts at formalizing software development estimation, and some even work a little bit occasionally, but none is really reliable. Note that the project that eventually became Windows Vista was estimated to be 2 years away by Microsoft for over 3 years, because as they got into the project they kept seeing more and more complexity in it even as they cut back on the feature promises, and they kept re-estimating the schedule.
 Signature Now where did I hide that website...
Sandy Foster - 10 Sep 2007 03:22 GMT > > My question may sound a bit dumb, but I've never had much exposure to > > people on a development team before. How do you know when to estimate [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > it even as they cut back on the feature promises, and they kept > re-estimating the schedule. Thanks for the answer, Bill. I thought it must be guesswork, but I wondered if perhaps there was a bit more science to it. <G>
 Signature Sandy sw.foster 1 (at) gmail (dot) com (remove/change the obvious) http://www.sandymike.net
Bill Cole - 10 Sep 2007 06:01 GMT > > > My question may sound a bit dumb, but I've never had much exposure to > > > people on a development team before. How do you know when to estimate [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Thanks for the answer, Bill. I thought it must be guesswork, but I > wondered if perhaps there was a bit more science to it. <G> There *is* a little, in that all of the estimation methodologies I've run across (as a board runs across a table saw...) are based in cutting up a project into progressively smaller pieces until you have a bunch of small estimatable tasks with definite dependencies. The problem is that every piece of that is error-prone and tends towards optimism.
I'll be quite surprised if there is an Odysseus beta in 2007.
 Signature Now where did I hide that website...
R. Millstein - 10 Sep 2007 01:41 GMT > Those are good questions. Good answers -- thank you.
Roberta
 Signature Roberta Millstein usenet@spamaway.rlm.net Remove "spamaway" to reply
-- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
|