Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Applications / Eudora / October 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Some good news about 6.2.4

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Bill Cole - 14 Oct 2006 22:15 GMT
Despite the fact that I am well past the 2 year anniversary of my last
payment to Qualcomm, installing the final release left me in paid mode
anyway. I guess they didn't quite have the chutzpah to charge for a
minor update after promising a major one for so long.

On the bad side, the bugs with IMAP and filters remain. :(

Signature

Now where did I hide that website...

Sander Tekelenburg - 16 Oct 2006 00:18 GMT
[...]

> On the bad side, the bugs with IMAP and filters remain. :(

Which filter bugs? I'm aware of one: entering more than x characters in
a filter rule will, when closing the Filter Window, make part of the
rule silently vanish. Lousy bug, that's been around for years.

Signature

Sander Tekelenburg, <http://www.euronet.nl/~tekelenb/>

Mac user: "Macs only have 40 viruses, tops!"
PC user: "SEE! Not even the virus writers support Macs!"

Bill Cole - 16 Oct 2006 02:52 GMT
> [...]
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> a filter rule will, when closing the Filter Window, make part of the
> rule silently vanish. Lousy bug, that's been around for years.

My issues are design flaws, not coding bugs.

1. A filter that moves a message between folders ends filtering of that
message absolutely. This applies to all types of mail, not just IMAP.

2. SpamWatch filtering of mail in IMAP mailboxes is dependent on an IMAP
extension that is relatively rare. There is a workaround documented in
the Qualcomm online support KB that mostly works, but it leaves the
"Junk" menu item essentially broken. There's no logical reason for that,
just a lack of of attention to the IMAP functionality of the program.

3. Moving a message into an IMAP mailbox (via filtering or manually)
switches the personality to that of the IMAP account, even if it has
already been set to some other personality by filtering. An example of
where this causes trouble is in using tagged addresses [0] for
discussion lists. With POP (i.e. client-side message storage) you can
have a filter set a personality and then move the message to a mailbox
just for that list. Replies will use the address of the personality set
before the mailbox move. IMAP cannot be made to work that way, because
moving into an IMAP mailbox sets the personality, but because of problem
#1 you can't have a filter repair the damage.

4. There is no way to filter on the real Date header content because
what you get in the Date 'header' for filtering is actually the result
of whatever the Date Display settings generates. There is also no way to  
on a logical date like "more than 2 days old" or "more than a day in the
future." That would be in the class of a feature request, but it would
replace any need to filter on the real Date header.

[0] A common MTA feature where any 'username+tag' or 'username-tag'
address will deliver to the 'username' mailbox.

Signature

Now where did I hide that website...

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.