> Maybe I'm the only one a bit sad to hear about Qualcomm retiring the
> Eudora codebase (but maybe not). I'm curious about one thing in
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Any idea why they would REQUIRE upgrading to 6.2.4 for sponsored mode?
It sounds to me like right now they don't require it. It's been years
since I've used Eudora in sponsored mode, but I believe versions before
6.2.4 will revert to Lite mode if you stop receiving ads. Since they
plan to stop trafficking ads (which means your Eudora would not receive
them), it sounds like they've modified the coding in 6.2.4 so that it
will stay in sponsored mode even if no ads come in.

Signature
Kathy - If you're reading this in your web browser from Google or
similar forum, NNTP "newsreaders" are a better way to access the
content. <http://www.aptalaska.net/~kmorgan/how-it-works.html>
Links to NNTP newsreaders at <http://www.newsreaders.com/>
> Hi all
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> QUALCOMM plans to stop trafficking advertisements at some point during
> open source development. "
This whole "in perpetuity" thing puzzles me somewhat. If it is an open
source project, once the open source version is available, what would it
matter whether you were licensed or not? Wouldn't you get all the
features for free?
Cheers
David
Kathy Morgan - 12 Oct 2006 07:18 GMT
> > Maybe I'm the only one a bit sad to hear about Qualcomm retiring the
> > Eudora codebase (but maybe not). I'm curious about one thing in
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> matter whether you were licensed or not? Wouldn't you get all the
> features for free?
Only for whatever comes out of the new project. They're talking about
the users who want to stick with Eudora 6.x.

Signature
Kathy - If you're reading this in your web browser from Google or
similar forum, NNTP "newsreaders" are a better way to access the
content. <http://www.aptalaska.net/~kmorgan/how-it-works.html>
Links to NNTP newsreaders at <http://www.newsreaders.com/>
Bill Cole - 12 Oct 2006 21:07 GMT
In article
<davidmor-3F2C5D.15352112102006@eth00.pnews.internode.on.net>,
> > Hi all
> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> matter whether you were licensed or not? Wouldn't you get all the
> features for free?
See http://wiki.mozilla.org/Penelope
The open source project won't be based on the existing Eudora source
(which I suspect has a rich set of licensing encumbrances...) but
instead be an attempt to "join the Eudora user experience with the
Mozilla platform."
I'm looking at Mulberry. It looks pretty good.

Signature
Now where did I hide that website...
David Morrison - 12 Oct 2006 22:57 GMT
> I'm looking at Mulberry. It looks pretty good.
"looks" is a poor choice of word :-)
It's feature set seems ok, but it certainly does not "look" good. Far
too cluttered.
David
Bill Cole - 13 Oct 2006 02:42 GMT
In article
<davidmor-1C7133.07571813102006@eth00.pnews.internode.on.net>,
> > I'm looking at Mulberry. It looks pretty good.
>
> "looks" is a poor choice of word :-)
>
> It's feature set seems ok, but it certainly does not "look" good. Far
> too cluttered.
A valid point.
How about: It seems like a suitable replacement for Eudora. Particularly
now that I am migrating to IMAP and am running into some bad problems
with Eudora's IMAP handling. Thunderbird and Apple Mail can't handle my
mail, but it looks like Mulberry might do the trick.

Signature
Now where did I hide that website...