Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Applications / Eudora / July 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

transfer message without closing it

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ReindeR Rustema - 29 Jun 2006 12:22 GMT
This might be a silly question, but checking the settings and searching
the Eudora knowledge database did not give me an easy answer.

I want to transfer an open message to one of my gazillion mailboxes
without it closing on me. It would save me a lot of work in a day with
those messages arriving in my inbox I reply to which are not already
automatically filtered to one of those boxes.

Now I have to manually add a Bcc line with the proper mailbox with the
Folder Carbon Copy function. If I can first transfer them and then reply
with the 'Automatically Fcc to original mailbox option' on it saves me
one complicated mouse movement per reply. To prevent RSI I want to do as
much as possible with the keyboard and avoid mouse complicated mouse
movements.

The only relevant information I found is under Settings:Moving Around:
After finishing a message:  ("Finishing" a message means deleting it,
transferring it, or paging past the end of it with the space bar.)

The second should not be considered as finished reading the message. It
is not finished, I am going to write a reply to it, but on beforehand I
already know in what mailbox I want to archive it.

The issue remains when tranferring it without using the Transfer Message
from the pull-down menu and dragging it using that mailbox window pane,
the drawer. With the inbox window open and after dragging it to a proper
mailbox in the drawer, the message is considered 'finished', even though
I still have the intention of typing a reply to it! Silly Eudora does
not understand my intentions...

Actually the drawer is usually not of any use because I have a gazillion
mailboxes. The pane is not big enough to show them all, let alone that I
can do the 'transfer gesture' as easily as I can with the pull-down
menu.
And besides that, the open message is covering my view on the inbox,
preventing me from selecting the message I want to drag to one of those
boxes in the drawer. I can not close the message and then drag it,
because I then have to find it back in one of those gazillion mailboxes
to open it again.

I am curious for a reaction to any of this.

Signature

ReindeR

Peter Ceresole - 29 Jun 2006 23:27 GMT
> And besides that, the open message is covering my view on the inbox,
> preventing me from selecting the message I want to drag to one of those
> boxes in the drawer.

I'm not sure that I really understand what you want to do.

If the message you want to transfer is open, why not keep open the
'Mailboxes' window (in the Windows menu) which will stay open for ever,
if you want. Then drag the envelope symbol in your message topbar to the
mailbox you want. That effects the transfer with one gesture.

If your mailbox list (like mine) is too long to fit into the height of
your screen, just one click on the Mailboxes window and typing the first
one or two letters of the mailbox name will bring it into the visible
part of the Mailboxes window; then you can drag the message across.

This will, however, close the message window, and you have to open the
window to open the message. I don't know of any way round that.
Signature

Peter

ReindeR Rustema - 30 Jun 2006 00:08 GMT
> then you can drag the message across.
>
> This will, however, close the message window, and you have to open the
> window to open the message.

Which is exactly what I want to prevent, you understand what I want, but
Eudora does not...

Signature

ReindeR

Sander Tekelenburg - 30 Jun 2006 16:51 GMT
[...]

> you understand what I want, but Eudora does not...

The solution is obvious: have Peter handle your email for you ;)

Signature

Sander Tekelenburg, <http://www.euronet.nl/~tekelenb/>

Mac user: "Macs only have 40 viruses, tops!"
PC user: "SEE! Not even the virus writers support Macs!"

nosredna - 30 Jun 2006 01:23 GMT
> This might be a silly question, but checking the settings and searching
> the Eudora knowledge database did not give me an easy answer.
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> I am curious for a reaction to any of this.

Here's how I would do it: I wouldn't be *opening* my message to reply; I
would make sure my Inbox (and all other mailboxes) shows in split pane
view so I can see all of my messages easily. I would then click into a
message in the list and drag it to the relevant mailbox in the drawer,
then click in to that mailbox, hit Command-R and reply away. Yes, I know
your mailbox list is too long to make dragging over comfortable. How
about breaking them down into groups (alphabetical or whatever). The
folders are springloaded, so it's not that much more difficult to drag
into the correct folder, although you'd have to click the triangle to
open the folder.
Kathy Morgan - 30 Jun 2006 07:38 GMT
[transfering message to another mailbox causes it to close]

If you click on the column heading in a mailbox and then click again,
the mailbox will list messages in the order received.  This doesn't
solve the problem of the closing messages, but it makes them easier to
find, since they sort to the bottom of the mailbox listing.

Another work-around would be to label the messages with the label
"requires answer" prior to moving them.  That would also make them
easier to locate.  (Depending on how many there are, you might want
search using the label as your search criterion.)  Once the message has
been answered, remember to change the label.

Signature

Kathy - post reviews of other newsgroups in news:news.groups.reviews
help for new users at <http://www.aptalaska.net/~kmorgan/>
Good Net Keeping Seal of Approval at <http://www.gnksa.org/>  

Peter Ceresole - 30 Jun 2006 08:23 GMT
> If you click on the column heading in a mailbox and then click again,
> the mailbox will list messages in the order received.  This doesn't
> solve the problem of the closing messages, but it makes them easier to
> find, since they sort to the bottom of the mailbox listing.

A couple of small points I'm not sure about...

Isn't that order defined by the date in the message headers? Because
I've had a very few irritating mails that hid themselves up in the
listing because they had the wong date... Is there really a way to
display them in order of the date they were *received*? I'm using
6.1/OS10.3.9 and I can't see a way of doing that, but I'd like to.
Signature

Peter

Kathy Morgan - 30 Jun 2006 16:18 GMT
> > If you click on the column heading in a mailbox and then click again,
> > the mailbox will list messages in the order received.  This doesn't
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> display them in order of the date they were *received*? I'm using
> 6.1/OS10.3.9 and I can't see a way of doing that, but I'd like to.

If you click once on the header in the date column, the messages are
sorted by the date in the message headers.  If you click a second time,
they are subsequently sorted by the date the message arrives in the
mailbox.  It won't resort them, but messages received after that get
listed in the order they are moved into the mailbox.  At least, that's
how it works for me, and I don't think I've done anything special in
x-eudora-settings that would have changed it.  I'm using 10.4.7 now, but
it worked before in 10.x.x.

Signature

Kathy - post reviews of other newsgroups in news:news.groups.reviews
help for new users at <http://www.aptalaska.net/~kmorgan/>
Good Net Keeping Seal of Approval at <http://www.gnksa.org/>

Peter Ceresole - 30 Jun 2006 17:42 GMT
> If you click once on the header in the date column, the messages are
> sorted by the date in the message headers.  If you click a second time,
> they are subsequently sorted by the date the message arrives in the
> mailbox.

Well, Lawdie miss Claudie, I didn't know about that. Thank you.

Next problem; if as you say, it doesn't restropectively change the order
os the display, how do I find out which order I have selected?

Normally, all my mails are sorted within their mailboxes by header date.
Clicking on the 'Date' column header makes no apparent difference at
all, except that the column header is, or isn't, highlighted. I've
looked in the manual but after a while I felt that life was too short...
Signature

Peter

Kathy Morgan - 02 Jul 2006 06:06 GMT
> Next problem; if as you say, it doesn't restropectively change the order
> os the display, how do I find out which order I have selected?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> all, except that the column header is, or isn't, highlighted. I've
> looked in the manual but after a while I felt that life was too short...

Um, I would select a recent message (say from 1-2 days old) from the In
box and transfer it to a new mailbox.  If it appears at the bottom of
the list, the box is sorting by date received.  If it appears in order
by the date in the headers, click once on the date header and try the
experiment again.

Signature

Kathy - post reviews of other newsgroups in news:news.groups.reviews
help for new users at <http://www.aptalaska.net/~kmorgan/>
Good Net Keeping Seal of Approval at <http://www.gnksa.org/>

Peter Ceresole - 02 Jul 2006 10:27 GMT
> Um, I would select a recent message (say from 1-2 days old) from the In
> box and transfer it to a new mailbox.  If it appears at the bottom of
> the list, the box is sorting by date received.  If it appears in order
> by the date in the headers, click once on the date header and try the
> experiment again.

Okay, I did that; clicking on the date column header toggles its
highlighting on and off. When the header is highlighted, sorting is done
in 'time moved into the mailbox' order. When not highlighted, it derives
its order from the mail header information. Very subtle- I thought it
would be the time received by Eudora that counted, rather than the time
moved into the folder. And since in my case, except when the mail's time
is mis-set at the origin, these times are pretty much the same... I
could never see a difference.

Thank you very much for that.
Signature

Peter

Sander Tekelenburg - 30 Jun 2006 17:15 GMT
[...]

> I've had a very few irritating mails that hid themselves up in the
> listing because they had the wong date...

This might be useful:

<x-eudora-setting:11307> File dates older than this will not be
believed; default is Jan 1, 1980.

Mine reads "0". I vaguely recall that Steve once told me this setting
should help deal with incorrectly dated mail 'disappearing' at the top
of a mailbox, but I might be mistaken. I don't recall having had the
problem for quite some time though -- might be due to this setting, or
due to coincidence.

Signature

Sander Tekelenburg, <http://www.euronet.nl/~tekelenb/>

Mac user: "Macs only have 40 viruses, tops!"
PC user: "SEE! Not even the virus writers support Macs!"

Peter Ceresole - 30 Jun 2006 17:42 GMT
> Mine reads "0". I vaguely recall that Steve once told me this setting
> should help deal with incorrectly dated mail 'disappearing' at the top
> of a mailbox, but I might be mistaken. I don't recall having had the
> problem for quite some time though -- might be due to this setting, or
> due to coincidence.

Thanks, Sander. It may well be coincidence; I've not had this 'date
disappearance' happen for a couple of years- but it did happen a few
times. I was using Eudora 3.1.3 Light. Golly, how innocent we were
then...
Signature

Peter

Sander Tekelenburg - 30 Jun 2006 17:06 GMT
[...]

I think this would be very useful (optional) behaviour. I suggest you
submit a feature request.

In the mean time, what I do is use a saved Search with 2 criteria. My
Search finds all mail that is either unread or (with a Label) marked as
'to be dealt with'. I have it look through certain mailboxes only (not
mailing lists) as a means to always have a view of only important mail,
but you could use it for all mailboxes if you want.

Save the Search, and use it as your one-size-fits-all mailbox. New
(unread) mail will show up automatically. Unread mail will unfortunately
only disappear from the Search results after you hit the Search button
again, so you'll have to do this regularly to ensure your view is up to
date. (Rumour has it Eudora 7 will do this automatically, much like
Mail.app's Smart Mailboxes.)

Messages that I don't want to immediately reply to, I assign a Label 'to
deal with' to. Because the Search also looks for those, this means that
you can then Transfer the message, but it will still be part of the
Search result and thus, although closed, still 'in your face' in your
Search 'mailbox' -- easy to open again.

Signature

Sander Tekelenburg, <http://www.euronet.nl/~tekelenb/>

Mac user: "Macs only have 40 viruses, tops!"
PC user: "SEE! Not even the virus writers support Macs!"

ReindeR Rustema - 01 Jul 2006 09:59 GMT
> I want to transfer an open message to one of my gazillion mailboxes
> without it closing on me.

Although I did not find an answer to this, while searching the Eudora
knowledge database with the keyword 'transfer' I did find a cool feature
I did not know about:

http://eudora.com/techsupport/kb/2480hq.html

"highlight the keyword you wish to file, then holding down your Control
key click on the word. You will see two options one is "Help" and the
other is "Transfer to" and the name of the mailbox."

I have a mailbox called 'Eudora' with all Eudora related e-mails. I
moved a message out of it to the Inbox and control-clicked on the word
Eudora in it. It worked! But it also closed on me, Eudora considers it
'finished'.

My problem would also be solved if the mailbox I transfer a message to
opens. Anyone with ideas on this?

Signature

ReindeR

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.