Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Programming / CodeWarrior / February 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

MachO Cross-Development in CodeWarrior Pro9?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sascha Kratky - 02 Feb 2004 11:07 GMT
Does CodeWarrior Pro9 correctly support the availablity macros
MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED and MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED as
described in Technote 2064 for MachO targets? (see
http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2002/tn2064.html)

Looking at the header /usr/include/AvailabilityMacros.h it seems that
the the necessary definitions of WEAK_IMPORT_ATTRIBUTE,
DEPRECATED_ATTRIBUTE, ... are only set up correctly for gcc but to for
mwcc.

Thanks,
Sascha
MW Ron - 03 Feb 2004 03:29 GMT
>Does CodeWarrior Pro9 correctly support the availablity macros
>MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED and MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED as
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>DEPRECATED_ATTRIBUTE, ... are only set up correctly for gcc but to for
>mwcc.

We are aware of little differences like this in the header and
implementation.  We usually work with Apple to fix them in a short time
frame.  I don't specifically know of any 10.3 features which require
setting the MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED and
MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED flags but it may be necessary with ld and
not mwld.

May I ask what are you trying to get done,  that you think you will need
the MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED and MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED?  It
may be that we have a more direct way  or better way to make it work.  
Contact me in e-mail with what you need and I'll consult with
engineering.

Ron

Signature

Metrowerks, maker of CodeWarrior   -  "Software Starts Here"  
Ron Liechty - MWRon@metrowerks.com - <http://www.metrowerks.com>

Paul Lalonde - 03 Feb 2004 08:20 GMT
> Does CodeWarrior Pro9 correctly support the availablity macros
> MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED and MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED as
> described in Technote 2064 for MachO targets? (see
> http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2002/tn2064.html)

AFAIK, no they aren't supported, at least not in 8.3 which is what I
use.  CodeWarrior does have an alternate means of specifying weak-linked
functions, though.  It involves adding to your project a text file with
an extension of ".wke", containing the symbols to weak-link against.
This file has the same syntax as a .exp file.  For example:

  # Drag Mgr functions added in MacOS X 10.3

  _NewDragWithPasteboard
  _GetDragPasteboard

BTW, the MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED and MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED
macros are used inconsistently in Apple's headers.  Some headers bracket
10.3-specific routines inside an #ifdef, in others the XXX_ATTRIBUTE
macros are used, and in others still there's no marking at all of
10.3-specific functions.

Hope this helps,

Paul
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.