Any know bugs with the Codewarrior 9.1 STL basic

Any know bugs with the Codewarrior 9.1 STL basic_string?

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

Kirk Haderlie - 07 Jan 2004 01:16 GMT

We have some cross-platform code that is built on top of the STL
basic_string. This code seem to have problems with assignment operator
since converting to Codewarrior 9.1. As anyone else experienced problem
with basic_string? Are there any fixes for the STL?

Signature

Kirk Haderlie
Design Engineer
kirk@vividimage.com

Reply to this Message

Howard Hinnant - 07 Jan 2004 01:47 GMT

> We have some cross-platform code that is built on top of the STL
> basic_string. This code seem to have problems with assignment operator
> since converting to Codewarrior 9.1. As anyone else experienced problem
> with basic_string? Are there any fixes for the STL?

I have one bug fix for the 9.0/9.1 <string>. The symptom is a
compile-time error that involves user-defined iterators which implicitly
convert to string::iterator (the guys at boost found it with
boost::debug_iterator). This bug wouldn't show up with the assignment
operator. Also the bug was introduced with 9.0, not 9.1. The 9.0 and
9.1 <string> headers are identical.

Can you post (or send me) a demo?

Thanks,
-Howard

Reply to this Message

Mac Forum / Programming / CodeWarrior / January 2004

Any know bugs with the Codewarrior 9.1 STL basic_string?