Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralPortable MacsHardwareNetworking
Applications
Mac ApplicationsEudoraFirefox / MozillaInternet ExplorerOutlook ExpressMS OfficeEntourageExcelPowerPointWordVirtual PCMedia PlayerOther MS Products
Programming
Mac ProgrammingCodeWarriorPerl
Country Specific
Australian Mac GroupUK Mac Group

Mac Forum / Programming / CodeWarrior / September 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

[ANN] CodeWarrior 10 news

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MW Ron - 01 Sep 2004 19:10 GMT
Mac Warriors,

The quiet period around our parent company's IPO (Freescale
Semiconductor - FSL) is over and we're going start making product
delivery announcements for the Macintosh market in September but I
wanted to let you in on what we've been doing. Some of the plans are not
yet confirmed and I don¹t want to have our plans appear as promises,
yet. As these items become more fleshed out we will be making formal
announcements that will include specific details and dates.

First, I'm personally very excited that Metrowerks¹ partnership with the
Mac Developers community will continue. We will continue providing bug
fixes and patches to CodeWarrior Development Studio, v9.x as necessary
(we recently released v9.3 patch, available via our web site now).

Secondly, I can say that we are planning a CodeWarrior Pro 9 optimizing
compiler and build chain for 64-bit support that allows you to build
optimized G5 applications with the build speeds you expect from
CodeWarrior. We are aiming at a beta version of these tools being seeded
by end of this year, but that is not a committed deadline yet. More on
this build chain will be announced this September. You will need to be a
CodeWarrior Pro 9 customer to get this functionality and it will
complement (not replace) the existing compilers so that we don't affect
on-going or archived projects.

Finally, let me assure you that providing the finest optimizing
compilers and tools available for Mac OS X remains a focus for
Metrowerks. To that end, in addition to G5 support, we are planning that
a NEW CodeWarrior for Mac OS will be available in 2005. This new
CodeWarrior will include a text based project format and will utilize
more OS X features.

You may ask why is it going to take so long, the answer is that we are
addressing some of the long standing customer requests and increasing
our emphasis on product quality. We believe our timing is right, Apple
is not releasing a new operating system until 2005 so we have the time
now to build a new product and not simply a repackaged IDE. It will be
worth the wait. Look for more details in September.

Ron

Signature

Metrowerks Community Forum is a free online resource for developers
to discuss CodeWarrior topics with other users and Metrowerks' staff
       --   http://www.metrowerks.com/community  --

Ron Liechty - MWRon@metrowerks.com - http://www.metrowerks.com

Not Important - 02 Sep 2004 04:39 GMT
> Look for more details in September.
>
> Ron

Ahhh, Ron, this is September any further new yet?

;)
Matt DeCaro - 03 Sep 2004 03:57 GMT
Nothing for Windows????

Signature

_____________________
Matt DeCaro
mdecaro@comcast.net
Matthew.DeCaro@jefferson.edu

> Mac Warriors,
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Ron
MW Ron - 03 Sep 2004 14:58 GMT
>Nothing for Windows????

Nothing on the drawing boards at this time, but we are still fluid.  

Ron

Signature

Metrowerks Community Forum is a free online resource for developers
to discuss CodeWarrior topics with other users and Metrowerks' staff
       --   http://www.metrowerks.com/community  --

Ron Liechty - MWRon@metrowerks.com - http://www.metrowerks.com

Jean-François Brouillet - 04 Sep 2004 02:14 GMT
>> Nothing for Windows????
>
> Nothing on the drawing boards at this time, but we are still fluid.
> Ron

I'd rather have MW put much more effort in their Mac hosted cross-compiler
to Windows or other and abandon the Win hosted one. If it had been me, I'd
rather have dropped CW-WinHosted than CW-JavaTarget ...

My 2p  (an happy CW 9.3 user, yes: there's at least one ;-)
--
JFB
MW Ron - 05 Sep 2004 02:33 GMT
>>> Nothing for Windows????
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>to Windows or other and abandon the Win hosted one. If it had been me, I'd
>rather have dropped CW-WinHosted than CW-JavaTarget ...

Thanks I'll pass your comments on

Ron

Signature

Metrowerks Community Forum is a free online resource for developers
to discuss CodeWarrior topics with other users and Metrowerks' staff
       --   http://www.metrowerks.com/community  --

Ron Liechty - MWRon@metrowerks.com - http://www.metrowerks.com

kiyookasan - 05 Sep 2004 22:37 GMT
>>Nothing for Windows????
>
> Nothing on the drawing boards at this time, but we are still fluid.  
>
> Ron

Windows schmindows.  Let's get those handheld compilers over to OSX.

Gen
Burt Johnson - 25 Sep 2004 21:29 GMT
Ron,

As I read your note, I come to the following conclusions. Can you give
me some guidance if I have misread the post?

- Java is apparently dead in CW

- Windows support appears to also die

If either of those is true, then I guess my exploration of Eclipse will
have to turn into a full conversion to it.  

After something like 13 years of using CW, I kinda hate to make the
change, but as I read things, it appears that MW is no longer going in
my direction. :-(

Signature

- Burt Johnson
 MindStorm, Inc.
 http://www.mindstorm-inc.com/software.html

MW Ron - 27 Sep 2004 20:41 GMT
>Ron,
>
>As I read your note, I come to the following conclusions. Can you give
>me some guidance if I have misread the post?
>
>- Java is apparently dead in CW

Not officially, we still have Java tools in our Learning Edition.  
However, I do not see us getting back into a market where we can not be
the best tools.

>- Windows support appears to also die

Not yet,  We just released a new version for Windows this year then an
update a few weeks ago.  I'm confident to state that we are the best
Standard C++ compiler and library combination available for Windows.

>If either of those is true, then I guess my exploration of Eclipse will
>have to turn into a full conversion to it.  
>
>After something like 13 years of using CW, I kinda hate to make the
>change, but as I read things, it appears that MW is no longer going in
>my direction. :-(

Our direction is embedded tools support,  this is where we are at and
will continue to go but we just reaffirmed our commitment to Apple and
Mac OS  and Mac OS X,  we did not do that for Java.

Ron

Signature

Metrowerks Community Forum is a free online resource for developers
to discuss CodeWarrior topics with other users and Metrowerks' staff
       --   http://www.metrowerks.com/community  --

Ron Liechty - MWRon@metrowerks.com - http://www.metrowerks.com

Larry - 26 Sep 2004 21:49 GMT
> Mac Warriors,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> now to build a new product and not simply a repackaged IDE. It will be
> worth the wait. Look for more details in September.

I've been looking most of September. Of course, this just says to
*look* for more details, it doesn't actually promise any more details.
Were there details I missed?

Larry
MW Ron - 27 Sep 2004 20:33 GMT
>> Mac Warriors,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>*look* for more details, it doesn't actually promise any more details.
>Were there details I missed?

I fired off a letter to the press release person and it appears that
this is going to be delayed even longer.

I'll post a full lettre apologizing.

Ron

Signature

Metrowerks Community Forum is a free online resource for developers
to discuss CodeWarrior topics with other users and Metrowerks' staff
       --   http://www.metrowerks.com/community  --

Ron Liechty - MWRon@metrowerks.com - http://www.metrowerks.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.